Open mike 24/08/2021

Written By: notices and features - Date published: - 123 comments
Categories: open mike

Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

123 comments on “Open mike 24/08/2021”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

  1. 1

    Apparently there is a movement gaining momentum to change the nz football team's name from the All Whites,

    Peak stupid rapidly approaching.

      1. 1.1.1

        He doesn't care about the name, he cares about the reason for it. I guess it does give the wrong impression if you don't know the origin of the name but it seems like there are way more worthy things for people to give their energy to.

      2. 1.1.2

        It appears to be one of those "World famous in New Zealand" nomenclatures. Remember the mystery and then release of the name for the NZ cricket team… wait for it… drum roll "The Black Caps!" And that was followed by a plethora of national team names (Black Socks, Black Sticks, Black Magic … Black Ferns – the list goes on). The problem is that when these teams travel they are invariably referred to as New Zealand. And even the All Blacks are listed and introduced when playing internationals as "New Zealand". They used to play smaller county and rugby matches as the All Blacks and were referred to by those unions outside NZ as The All Blacks. A bit like the MCC which is the official title for the English touring team but they are England when it comes to test matches.

      2. 1.2.2

        A moderator has been trying to get your attention for a few days K (Incognito above). Please take some time to read the links to get clear on what is going on.

        It's a good idea when coming onto TS each day to check the replies tab to see who has replied. If it's an author/or mod, please read.

      2. 1.3.2

        Only in your world. 😉

        The word Football was dropped from the name New Zealand Rugby Football Union (NZRFU), in 2006.

        Quiet day in your neck of the woods? Looking to wind up a few boof-heads.

        I trust you are keeping well and the lockdowns aren’t getting you down.

            1. 1.3.2.1.1.1

              There's a great deal of kicking in rugby football. That's why it's called football.

              Your argument is valid in the case of that American "game" in which hardly anyone ever kicks the ball, and "play" stops after a couple of seconds.

              1. 1.3.2.1.1.1.1

                Gridiron is an odd game, I'll give you that, but I would have the split between handling and kicking would be about the same as in rugby. And Australian rule for that matter?

                1. 1.3.2.1.1.1.1.1

                  Gridiron is an odd game, I'll give you that,

                  The game is called, bizarrely, football. The "gridiron" is the very narrow field, marked up oppressively with lines every ten yards, on which it is played.

                  but I would have the split between handling and kicking would be about the same as in rugby.

                  No, it is completely different. Kicking is the primary skill in rugby; there is only one way to move the ball forward, apart from carrying it, and that is to kick it. Kicking is routine in rugby, and it's the reason why the game opens up and flows, rather than being a form of trench warfare. To kick the ball in general play is utterly unthinkable in American (and Canadian) football—which is football in name only.

                  And Australian rules for that matter?

                  As in rugby, kicking is paramount in Australian football. Although the ridiculous "handball"—punching the ball from a closed fist instead of kicking it as in rugby— has marred the game for decades.

                1. 1.3.2.1.1.1.2.1

                  Of course, running the ball instead of kicking it is always an option. But kicking is essential a lot of the time. Look at the way the Tricolors destroyed the All Blacks in the 1999 World Cup semi-final: all three of their tries in the second half were the result of kicking the ball.

                    1. 1.3.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1

                      Some things can never be forgotten. I'll bet the players will never forget it. Neither will the French of course. They never forget anything.

                      I was in Paris about 3 years ago. At lunch my wife and I were eating in a Bistro when a couple of French men nearby asked where we came from. When we said New Zealand they insisted on apologizing for the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. I could, only just, remember exactly which year it was. They behaved as if it was just yesterday.

            1. 1.3.2.1.3.1

              The NZRU, which has allowed Sky Television to ruin every broadcast by insisting on “exclusive” interviews with coaches during matches, and inflicting seemingly endless talking heads shows on us, and is busy selling the “brand” to a New York venture capital outfit, is hardly a credible or reliable source for anything relating to the history and heritage of the game. And no one except those boofheads on Sky uses the puerile five-letter word for football.

              1. 1.3.2.1.3.1.1

                Can't comment, not being a Sky Sports subscriber, but this 'boofhead' refers to NZ's national game by that "puerile five-letter word".

                Imho the tide’s going out on the term 'rugby football' in NZ (where everyone knows rugby's name), but I admire your 'reverse Cnut' principles. Time will tell whether your (bitter?) rearguard action bears fruit.

                https://www.newzealand.com/nz/rugby/

      4. 1.3.4

        Oh ffs ,I carefully decided to go with football due to having had uptight tossers rant when I've called it soccer. Although you successfully stopped any conversation on whether the all whites should drop ther name.

        1. 1.3.4.1

          Changing the All Whites name because some people (who have no interest in football anyway) can't get over their amateur phychology of projecting racism is not going to be popular.

  2. 2

    Oh really – do we really have to know that "Islamic State-affiliate Suhayra Aden's family moved to New Zealand after Australia refused to accept her" as reported by Stuff. Besides, how is she still and 'affiliate'. If she was, she wouldn't be here – doh!

    How long will it be before some perverted reporter thinks we will have to know about the contents of the woman's drawers, unless some enterprising cereal manufacturer gets in first to use her to advertise their burka friendly new product.

    Let's leave Ms Aden and her family alone so that she and her and they can become ordinary New Zealanders who contribute to the rich fabric of the country. She doesn't need 10,000,000 eyes looking over her shoulder to see if she is putting together a bloodthirsty Caliphate that will over-run the country.

    1. 2.1

      Couldn't agree more.

      Most of us do daft things in our youth and most of us get away with it gaining knowledge of a lesson well learnt

    2. 3.2

      The thing I love most about right-wingers is their accuracy and attention to detail.

      That being said can you please tell me who the hell this "Adern" is?

    3. 3.3

      Parliament TV in the afternoon for democracy in a Level 4 Lockdown. You're welcome, any more delusions you are suffering from need assistance. Enjoy your 1pm walks and if necessary mask up and pop into your local supermarket and slyly turn a couple of magazines around, you'll feel so much better.

          1. 3.3.1.1.1

            Point is Parliament TV is not a replacement for debate in the house / over a virtual forum! It is a way to the public to watch. No more, no less.

            1. 3.3.1.1.1.1

              Here we go. Quote from the Herald. (Don't have a link.)

              "Robertson is the first of a line-up of ministers expected to front to Opposition and other MPs in virtual select committees this week after the Prime Minister's decision to suspend the sitting of Parliament."

              I believe some of these are being broadcast on Parliament TV. So in fact they are a replacement to debate in the house. whoosh.
              Democracy in action.

              1. 3.3.1.1.1.1.1

                Here ya go.

                Schedule of meetings

                1. Home
                2. Parliamentary Business
                3. Select committees
                4. Schedule of meetings

                The select committee meeting schedule lists the time, date, and venue for each select committee meeting planned for the coming week. It also shows the business items that will be considered at each meeting. To find out who is booked to speak at select committee hearings please see the submitters list.

                Under COVID-19 Alert Level 4 any select committees meetings will take place virtually over Zoom. The schedule is subject to change at short notice and the meeting format is dependent on changes in the COVID alert levels.

                Meetings marked as 'Parliament TV' can be viewed at Freeview 31, Sky 86, Vodafone 86, Parliament On Demand or the Covid-19 Response select committees page.

                Items marked “open to the public” will continue to be livestreamed to the committee's Facebook page.

                https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/schedule-of-meetings/

              2. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2

                Jeepers, you really are slow aren't you!

                Parliament TV is in no way a replacement for Parliament. It's TV for goodness sake! MPs can't interact with it.

                Most everyone else has been able to conduct business via Teams, Zoom or some other forum. Meanwhile Ardern cancels Parliament. Why when there is no need. There are technology solutions to allow Parliament to continue virtually.

                Wooossh.

                1. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1

                  Settle Petal, it's you being slow, I suspect on purpose. Parliament TV is where you can watch Democracy in Action, the opposition questioning the government during the lockdown. You were whining about the PM not being able to run Democracy Virtually. We have pointed out that is exactly what they are managing to do. Get a grip.

                  1. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1.1

                    I love the idea that David might think that when MPs aren't in the House they're actually watching parliament TV rather than doing all the parliamentary business that isn't in the House.

                    Or is it some sort of tory shorthand for zoom meetings rather than infecting each other face-to-face?

                    1. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1

                      I suspect he knows exactly how ridiculous he sounds, but once he’s thrown out a Nat/Act slogan there’s no going back for him.

                    2. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.2

                      A spark of light might have come on in your second paragraph McFlock. The Red Blooded One still seems all at sea.

                      Apparently everyone else can do zoom, but Ardern is a bit special and needs to cancel rather than move to the virtual world.

                    3. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.2.1

                      OMG. David. Even RNZ had live coverage of the committee ZOOM meeting holding the government to account. The ZOOM meeting with David Seymour and Shayne Reti asking Grant Robertson and Ashley Bloomfield questions. How much flipping democracy do you want.

                    5. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.2.1.1.1

                      This was your rant that I was reacting to.

                      "Adern can chair an APEC leaders summit virtually but apparently not a democracy"
                      No mention of Parliament, only Democracy.

                      Yep, happy to have you give up on me, cause we can see right through you. Bye bye.

                    7. 3.3.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.3

                      Mate, no spark needed: everyone can see you a mile off.

                      Select committees are as much a part of parliament as debates in the House.

                      You don't even want all business conducted in the House to be done. You just want the opposition to yell nonsensicalities as soundbites for the 6pm news.

                      boohoo. The nats continued implosion can be put on hold for a couple of weeks.

            2. 3.3.1.1.1.2

              There hasn't been any debate for a very long time. All we've seen are petty and childish stunts by an opposition that have proven what a waste of space and taxpayers funds they have become.

              2. 3.3.1.1.1.2.2

                Are you advocating we do away with Parliament?

                I guess it’s an option. History is littered with countries that have given that option a go.

                1. 3.3.1.1.1.2.2.1

                  Are you advocating we do away with Parliament?

                  Wooooosssssh

                  If anything, I think they’re advocating doing away with the current Opposition and build back better.

              3. 3.3.1.1.1.2.3

                All we've seen are petty and childish stunts by an opposition that have proven what a waste of space and taxpayers funds they have become.

                They're not a complete waste of space – consider their entertainment value. Collins' eyebrows (not joking – or am eye?), Seymour's twerking, Bridges' cavorting at a recent party conference, a Bridge too far (Merv from Manuwera), Boag, Ngāti Goldsmith, Woodhouse's concern for the homeless – and who could forget Maureen Pugh.

                Such fascinating creatures. Calling Puckish Rogue – come in Puck.

                Btw, what's Luxon (Local Govt, Māori Development, Assoc. Transport) been up to lately? https://christopherluxon.national.org.nz/news

              1. 3.3.1.1.1.3.1

                "prorouged"? Heaven forbid.

                I blush at the thought. Far too many commo agitating, lefty comrade, fellow travelling, pinko, woke, virtue-signallers already without Parliament being prorouged!

                Better check under the beds!

            4. 3.3.1.1.1.4

              In principle debate in the house is really important. But in practice it is asinine. If the opposition respected the institution enough to ask relevant questions and research and meticulously critique government policy and actions, you'd have a good point.

              Sadly, Parliament disgraces itself pretty much every day. It is quite dispensable for the duration of lockdown.

  4. 4

    The kindest parliament on earth

    Even crustaceans are cared for.

    The government is being kind to lobsters

    ….lobster complaint upheld by parliamentary committee

    Bonnie Flaws – Stuff.co.nz, Aug 23, 2021

    Last week, Parliament’s Regulations Review Committee released a report agreeing with the Animal Law Association position that freezing lobsters prior to slaughter was not consistent with the objectives and intentions of the Animal Welfare Act 1999…..

    …..Stedman​ said slaughter practices were based on outdated scientific knowledge. Lobsters experience significant pain and distress when chilled and boiled alive, according to research…..

    Lobsters that have been frozen then boiled will recover consciousness and experience pain during the boiling process, and evidence shows they also remained conscious for longer as a result of the freezing and had complex nervous systems, she said.

    MPI had worked with the industry to ensure people were aware that lobsters were sentient and needed to be stunned and killed according to regulations, an MPI spokeswoman previously said.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/126151650/animal-law-association-lobster-complaint-upheld-by-parliamentary-committee

    1. 4.1

      Good job by govt there, the way we treat all sea animals is usually pretty horrific…now they need to get on to banning big game fishing which is without doubt the most disgusting and violent 'sport' legal in this country…once the cruelty of it is witnessed by any human with any empathy for animals, it can never be forgotten.

        1. 6.1.1.1

          Naomi wasn't looking too happy…heh!

          I was doing a metal voiceover, though I would hate to disparage the memory of Big Dave by sharing.wink

          1. 6.1.1.1.1

            Lol.

            Early political learning for me, that basically NZ didn't give a shit morally about politician's private lives. Open secret, media weren't reporting. Unlike say the UK where it would have been a scandal.

    2. 6.2

      Most of the election coverage is online somewhere on Youtube and as a tragic, I rewatched some of it last election. Even knowing the outcome, the 2005 election coverage is amusing as Mike Williams spends all night predicting that Labour will come from behind on the back of South Auckland and is proven right in the last hour or two.

    3. 6.3

      The worst election result for New Zealand in it's post war history IMO..the end of the NZ Labour Party as a serious political machine for workers and the dispossessed, marked the introduction and ascension of centrist third way neo-liberalism into New Zealand like an incurable cancer…I for one had no idea what I was voting for at the time to be honest, I was young idealistic and could only see the anti nuke position, taught me a good lesson though..governments lie, and always be a critical thinker, especially when it comes to politics and politicians.

      1. 6.3.1

        Labour lost a lot of core supporters after the Lange years. Left voters had no representation for 20-odd years because of constant neoliberal bait and switches.

    4. 6.4

      .
      This is gonna be a Big Big Night ! …

      … latest Heylen Poll suggests we should have a Socialist Govt by Midnight … (Heylen 7 July 1984 … Lab 49.1%, Nat 33.2%, Socred 8.9%, NZP 8.8%).

      But bear in mind, the Nats were still in front as recently as May (Heylen 26 May 1984 … Nat 43.8%, Lab 42.7%) … so might still be a little nail-biting … can't entirely rule out Muldoon once again clinging to power by his fingertips …
      angry

      But overall, looking forward to a decisive return to the protection of working class interests & local industry and a censure of the ostentatiously wealthy under a superb team of Socialist Intellectuals: Mr Douglas, Mr Prebble & Dr Bassett in particular. Rest assured, the Country will be in mighty safe hands.

      But let’s sit back with the popcorn & see what Mr Bryant & Mr Cockram & their exciting state-of-the-art technical wizardry deliver us.

      1. 6.4.1

        .

        Fantastic !!! young Peter Dunne currently ahead of Templeton in Ohariu by 162 votes ! Peter has a big future in Left politics.

  7. 7

    Very strange and rather sick critique of the PM by a Graham Adams in today's Herald. Wonder if he will do a follow-up of Judith Collins.

    1. 7.1

      Yes Reality, that Adams has a need to paint Jacinda as an "indoctrinated religious crafty politician". Trying to paint her nature as Mormon kindness, because…

      I think he is muddling her with Scot Morrison. Now there is a crafty religious nutter with ties to Hillside and a henchman called Dutton.

      1. 7.1.1

        The mud continues to be slung by nationals herald in many forms.

        Scotty the other day shall we look forward to a Pauline Hanson oped soon.

  10. 10

    A fair chunk of the British Press seem to have cooled of in their opinion of our PM it would appear.

    "Mark Dolan from the GB News took aim at New Zealand and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern for putting the country into lockdown"

    "Living with this virus is going to be the only show in town. Zero COVID leads to zero economies, zero society, zero freedom and zero democracy."

    "Another writer from the Telegraph wrote a brutal opinion piece on Ardern's decision to move New Zealand to a level 4 lockdown. Matthew Lesh called the decision "poetic justice" and New Zealand's approach has "frightening consequences".

    "Elimination becomes a costly strategy with very limited benefit. What's the point of lockdowns and maintaining closed borders for a virus that, with vaccines in the mix, no longer causes much harm to individual people?"

    We are obviously stuck in this time warp until the vaccination status of the population gets up to at least a second world country status. The virus isn't going to go away. We will have to live with it unless we go over to the world of North Korea and lock everyone up for ever. Well stop talking about how wonderful our approach is supposed to be and get on with the vaccination of everyone who wants to have it. Then, as an old Negro spiritual put it "Let my people go!"

    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/isolated-dystopia-world-reacts-to-nzs-bad-to-worse-frightening-lockdown-move-nearly-a-week-on/ar-AANCkUg?ocid=msedgntp

      1. 10.1.1

        "Living with this virus is going to be the only show in town…"

        "Living with the virus" is a completely meaningless phrase – because every response to date by every government around the world is a version of "living with the virus". That's because the virus exists – and so by definition we have to live with it. These different versions of living with the virus do differ from each other in how much death and disease they will tolerate in the community.

        What we are seeing is an appropriation of "living with the virus" to mean one particular version of living with the virus that has a particularly high tolerance for death and disease. It is scummy propaganda of the highest order – because instead of having to justify their high tolerance for death and disease, its sociopathic proponents can hide behind an illusion of inevitability. A decent media with half a brain would shoot down this filthy deceit.

    2. 10.2

      How do you fancy your chances of surviving an epidemic of influenza or Covid-19 in NZ with open borders? Do ya feel lucky?

      1. 10.2.1

        When I have had my 2 doses of the vaccine, and we have booster shots available I think my chances of surviving, even at my age, are pretty good. I might get ill but I am unlikely to die from the disease.

        With those precautions I don't think it will be any more dangerous than flu is. Yes there will be a chance of dying but I will accept that for the chance to travel overseas, and have people travel here.

        After all, a complete closure of the borders and having no one enter the country without a couple of weeks of quarantine is going to end sometime anyway. Politicians are never going to accept that limitation on their lifestyle.

        So I feel lucky. What about you, punk?

        1. 10.3.1.1

          Perhaps you could tell us why we should still have that barbaric method of testing for Covid 19? Do you like the thought of the discomfort for yourself or is it the idea that someone else will be affected that gives you a frisson of excitement?

          There are comments from experts in the subject that using this method instead of saliva tests is a factor in preventing the country from keeping up with the outbreak. It is being portrayed in New Zealand as not being accurate but at least one authority says.

          "“It's frustrating that this [accuracy] is still a question and shows how much misinformation has been passed onto the NZ public."

          https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/126151636/slow-saliva-testing-rollout-hurting-new-zealands-ability-to-get-on-top-of-outbreak-scientist?cid=PDM711657&bid=1391011913

          1. 10.3.1.1.1

            Much of the probing, prodding, surgery, and treatments in modern medicine are pretty barbaric when you think about it, e.g., cut it, amputate it, it burn it, freeze it, radiate it, poison it, et cetera.

            I don’t necessarily buy the argument that saliva tests will make a fundamental change in the current environment. It depends on what the limiting factors are. It could increase the pressure on the testing labs, which are already straining, as I mentioned last night here: https://thestandard.org.nz/daily-review-23-08-2021/#comment-1810984.

            I commented 2 days ago on saliva testing here: https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-22-08-2021/#comment-1810628.

          2. 10.3.1.1.2

            Perhaps you could tell me which countries managed to get on top of the Delta variant thanks to saliva testing. I could not find that info in your link. NZ can learn so much from others because we’re so much behind the eight ball.

    4. 10.4

      Got to wonder why the sudden brit campaign by Murderoch to slag off the NZ response. Right wing regime seeks likeminded for free trade and virus swapping?

      1. 10.4.1

        passing the "130,000 dead" threshold might have some asking questions about whether it's really "over" despite all the partying…

    5. 10.5

      Well, somehow I can't insert a text extract from FB so I'll just type what was said by Ciaran Irvine:

      "The right wing media here (and also in the rest of the world) NEED Jacinda to fail at this – because how she has handled Covid indicts them all as not just clueless spoofers but in many countries actual mass murderers,

      "The Right has been utterly, catastrophically, psychotically Wrong all over the world at every single step of this pandemic, so Aotearoa's success thus far infuriates them and they NEED us to fail."

      No idea who Ciaran Irvine is, but their comment seems absolutely to the point.

  11. 11

    Majority responce from a group of at risk teens offered covid vaccination – nope, not having that, the gummint will use it to track me.

    Well done to the fucks who platformed/spread this shit.

    //

  12. 12

    What an appalling rant from Kate Hawkesby in the Herald yesterday(?). Venomous woman filled with loathing. Actually that shows in her face, as are the embedded sneers of Hosking.

      2. 12.1.2

        I understand they have children and one has to worry about the effect those two nasty negative people, from the same household have on them

    1. 13.1

      That's an excellent thread

      I've also heard so much commentary about how lockdowns create uncertainty and how this is difficult for people to manage. It leads to emotional stress and mental health problems (I have no doubt about this being the case for some people).

      Personally, I like living with the certainty that we will have lockdowns rather than the uncertainly of who I’m going to contract a life-altering / life-threatening illness from if we have to “learn to live” with the virus in the community before we understand and can safely manage the game of catch-up between variants and vaccines.

      I do understand that it is really important to have certainty about what you need to do – tomorrow, in a week’s time, in a month. What I don’t get is how the people who are upset by the uncertainty lockdowns bring, are probably not the same people who worry about the uncertainty that people in the precariat live with every single day of their working lives.

      1. 14.1.1

        The trollishness comes from not engaging the original argument for economic justice and obsession with counting dead bodies. Bloody revolutions were a desperate response to unbearable suffering, Marxism was the vehicle in some cases. But bloody revolutions were also necessary to overthrow feudalism and institute democracy; it's just that they didn't happen in living memory

        1. 14.1.1.1

          The deaths in Stalinist Russia weren't just from the revolution though, right? They went on for a long time and were extremely excessive.

          1. 14.1.1.1.1

            Well, there is a discussion to be had about whether the "revolution" is restricted solely to the overthrow of the monarchy, or includes (in the case of the USSR) the following process of repelling multiple massive invasions and turning an agrarian-peasant economy into an industrial power.

            But really, it all turns into a "no true Scotsman" argument: socialist nations that didn't get particularly murdery get labelled "social democratic" or whatevs while capitalist countries that get murdery are "imperialist" rather than capitalist, and on the other side murdery socialist govts get called "failed dictatorships of the proletariat" (at best) and reasonably stable and humane mixed economies have their benefits attributed to socialism and negatives attributed to capitalism.

            2. 14.1.1.1.1.2

              What did you think of Lew's original point, that many people viewing socialism through a freedom vs totalitarianism lens is due to socialism's history of murder rather than contemporary lack of class analysis? (I'd guess it is both).

              1. 14.1.1.1.1.2.1

                Meh. Seems largely bollocks to me (especially in regards to yanks worried about "socialism", but we have it here, too).

                "Socialism" as a scareword is devoid of meaning, it's a label applied to a number of different nations without reference to the situations faced at the time.

                Is that label "socialism" more or less murdery than capitalist/imperialist nations? That's like arguing which billionaire is more wealthy today – comparisons are pretty meaningless when you get to that level. Take Cambodia, and then the Bengal famine. Did Beria kill more people than Zaharoff? Who really cares.

                And that's with a reasonably unbiased assessment – throw on decades of propaganda in both directions, and most people wouldn't recognise the polsci definition of "socialism" or "capitalism" if it hit them in the face (and the latter often does).

                But start talking about bosses and fair tax rates, and pretty soon the people who think socialism is a bit murdery start supporting policies that get them healthcare – until Fox calls it "socialism".

        2. 14.1.1.2

          Tis disingenuous to draw attention to 'socialist' revolutions and death tolls.

          Societal breakdowns generally involve murder and death irrespective of their 'ism'

          it is entirely likely that a future death toll will be laid at the door of 'environmentalism'.

    1. 15.1

      I quite like Plato’s cave allegory, ever since I had to translate that piece of text. This whole pandemic apparently started with a bat out of hell. So, staying in the cave sounds pretty safe. I wonder what cavemen would have done when a cave bear tried to enter the cave they were in: would they fight for their lives and defend themselves and the cave or run away and be exposed to all other dangers as well as having the bear chasing them? We will never know the answer, of course.

Comments are closed.