The Standard

Open Mike 04/08/25

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, August 4th, 2025 - 58 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

58 comments on “Open Mike 04/08/25 ”

  1. Kay 2

    What on earth has happened to Morning Report? The last bastion of intelligent and non-patronising news in NZ, it's now also joining the dumbing down bandwagon.

    I gave up after the first 1/2 hour this morning, thanks to the non-stop yabbering between Ingrid and Corrin, which has been getting progressively worse over the last year. Are they being told to provide a running commentary of their personal views on a story, or doing it themselves and the boss thinks it's fine?

    MR is slipping down the ranks for breakfast shows, and it's easy to see how. Thank goodness for Concert programme, and at least the RNZ website doesn't incessantly yabber.

    RNZ’s flagship news programme Morning Report lost 22,100 listeners – or 6.2% of its audience

    https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/360703624/thousands-nationwide-turn-rnz-radio-programmes

    • Dennis Frank 2.1

      Are they being told to provide a running commentary of their personal views on a story, or doing it themselves and the boss thinks it's fine?

      Good question. I've always been in favour of media presenters being allowed to be themselves, so performance naturally becomes medial. Like Hipkins, they feel compelled to reflect the average kiwi, who always struggles to figure anything out.

      My guess is that their boss thinks their style is entirely suitable on that basis. I agree losing 6% is a worry for them, but the loss is relative to any noticeable gain by competitors. My hunch is that the loss in more likely due to a drift away from the establishment media generally. So easy to get the latest online now.

      I do MR at times when I'm in the kitchen but like you I'd prefer a more thoughtful go at topics. Ingrid is a lot sharper than when she was weather presenter on tv, to her credit. Corrin valiantly tries to fill his empty head with thoughts, but it ain't easy…

      • Kay 2.1.1

        Like Hipkins, they feel compelled to reflect the average kiwi, who always struggles to figure anything out.

        But surely, this is hardly the way to increase their audience/hang onto the ones they already have? I was of the idea there is still a decent amount of people in this country who take issue with dumbing down of the media in general, and already avoid the commercial stations for that reason (the no ads is an added bonus). It's like they're deliberately self-imploding. A cut in their funding doesn't have to mean a cut in their presenter quality, surely?

        My hunch is that the loss in more likely due to a drift away from the establishment media generally. So easy to get the latest online now.

        Yes, I'd agree with that statement to a degree, but there's still something more tangible about listening to the radio, plus one can multi-task whilst listening. Thankfully the RNZ website still provides quality news and analysis.

        • Drowsy M. Kram 2.1.1.1

          1News: "Here are your latest headlines" – you can read them for yourselves.

      • Sanctuary 2.1.2

        The entire model RNZ is using is completely fucked in the social media age.

        Joe Rogan was instrumental in Trump winning. An army of right wing online shows and the hyper-partisan Fox News act as MAGA cheerleaders.

        In response, the Meidas Touch was created and it now outperforms Rogan.

        A generation of people raised on the WWF wants tribal politics and their side as heroes and the other side as villains. Rogan vs. Meidas.

        Youtubers often present far more detailed in depth stuff than the MSM like RNZ and TVNZ, who "news" often resembles little more than a long-form contempuous sneer at their audiences and what they think of its intelligence.

    • gsays 2.2

      Yep, about 18 months ago the batteries went flat in the little old school transistor in the kitchen.

      It was tuned to 101fm, my son jokes that it didn't pick up any other station. I haven't replaced them.

      Occasionally I hear MR, sometimes in the car, sometimes on the work radio. Things haven't improved.

    • Grey Area 2.3

      Yes, Morning Report is pretty dire now. It's clear that someone thinks it's a good idea to make it more populist. Sounds snobby I know but I don't listen to Morning Report to hear so much sport.

      It seems to have increased since Nathan Rarere has been doing the pre-MR slot. For what it's worth I've sent messages about it. Then the other day there was time spent discussing the passing of Hulk Hogan as a sports item when WWE is not sport, it's entertainment.

      The amount of time spent on business is another waste. The business editor reads a list of figures for currencies, Brent crude oil, stock exchange indexes etc which anyone who deals in those areas would already know and which for the rest of us are irrelevant. If something actually happens it will be a news item.

      And then we're told they will be back about 30 minutes later to update the numbers. Really?

      I listen to Morning Report via streaming because where I live rural we can't get radio reception. So there are few options. But it's become a hard listen at times.

      • Kay 2.3.1

        For what it's worth I've sent messages about it.

        I was considering doing that, but wondering if there's any point? I feel it would take a mass petition for the powers that be to register they have a problem. But not do anything of course.

        • Grey Area 2.3.1.1

          Sometimes I can't help myself even if it is tilting at windmills. wink

          I text them every couple of months, sometimes in response to coalition lies, sometimes to say well done if either Hipkiss or Dann have been persistent in trying to get Luxon to actually answer their questions rather than repeat his talking points, and most often to whinge about there being too much sport on Morning Report. smiley

    • Sanctuary 2.4

      The demise of the legacy access media is a textbook example of inability to adapt to change.

      Traditional media is losing power, especially in the area of politics, while social media is gaining power and over time will come to completely dominate the political discourse.

      While this should have been obvious a decade ago, the traditional institutions for political expression – the mainstream parties, the legacy media – didn't adapt and move into that space, leaving an enormous vacuum into which the alt-right moved.

      Morning Report is a great example of the growing irrelevance of the legacy media and it's ongoing inability to adapt to the new way of doing politics in the new civic square. Part of the problem is rather than reach out and employ influencers and podcasters and Youtubers the legacy MSM has stubbornly stuck to rotating around an increasingly diminishing MSM ecosystem the same faces who have presided over failure everywhere, whilst clinging to aging, over-paid and completely out-of-touch "celebrity" presenters and opinion piece writers whose last remaining "asset" is the institutional privileges of power like press gallery membership, access to power and the opportunities for well paid sinecures in PR

      A great example of how captured and out of touch the MSM is with people these days has been the absolute gaslighting of the public over the cost of living and butter prices specifically. Rather than attempt to challenge power and asking tough questions about the roles, place and responsibilities of organisations like Fonterra the MSM instead provided a platform for the neoliberal elites to lecture people about how lucky we are to have to pay $20+ for a kilo of butter.

      In other words, Morning Report and the rest of them (Seven Sharp, etc) increasingly identify with and act as apologists for neoliberalism, babbling incoherent flimflammery and "lifestyle light entertainment" padding to mask their growing irrelevance.

    • Bearded Git 2.5

      Ingrid is dire. Corin is fine, or he would be if he wasn’t working with Ingrid.

      Ingrid effortlessly drags the whole show down with her bland and mundane comments and toothless interviews.

      • Kay 2.5.1

        Yes, she is dire. But I'm sure she wasn't this irritating when she first got the job. Just slightly irritating.

      • Grey Area 2.5.2

        Pretty accurate summary BG. Dann runs hot and cold for me. Hipkiss can occasionally rise to the occasion but very rarely. I groan at the patter between items which to me often sounds like the sort of vacuousness I'd find on commercial breakfast FM radio if I listened to it more.

  2. PsyclingLeft.Always 3

    National pinned. I hope they use a large, stainless steel pin? The scurvy creeps.(And another good RNZ article : )

    National pins re-election hopes on economy

    But to borrow a well-worn Christopher Luxon phrase, the cost of living is the barnacle that won't get off the boat, and Luxon spent his speech – and much of the week leading up to it – trying to convince people that National, not Labour, is the steady hand on the tiller amid choppy global waters.

    Lol the irony….

    The government is at pains to say it can't control global events, although it spent a lot of time criticising the previous government for blaming global events.

    Luxon did not mention the other "guys in the government" on Saturday.

    Though some did…(albeit putting the best face forward !)

    National party supporters that RNZ spoke to

    "They're very aggressive people that he's in Parliament with, but he's handled it extremely well," said another.

    "It's like you're the mother in the house, and you have to herd two cats, who do co-operate sometimes, and other times they've got other agendas. From a managerial point of view, I think he's doing excellently in the light of the type of political system we've got."

    Last (final?) words from Luxury Luxon….

    Luxon wants the country to "say yes" to more

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/568874/national-pins-re-election-hopes-on-economy

    If we want to save NZ, just say NO .

    • Obtrectator 3.1

      If you want to get all the barnacles off the boat, you have to interrupt the voyage and careen – which involves taking the boat out of the water altogether ….

      • PsyclingLeft.Always 3.1.1

        Indeed. Altho the NACT1 vessel is so rotten (to the core?) it might not even make it to port : )

  3. Hunter Thompson II 4

    National now wants to open up the conservation estate so more concessions can be granted to business interests.

    In the PM's view the current concession system is broken, so "[to create] more jobs, more growth, and higher wages, we’re going to fix the Conservation Act to unleash a fresh wave of concessions – including tourism, agriculture, and infrastructure – where it makes sense.”

    Of course, what makes sense to the PM won't make sense to people who care about the outdoors and who see the conservation estate as a public asset to be held on trust for all NZers.

    National's business mates don't want a concession; they want a padlock.

    And why agriculture is on the list is a mystery. That sector already gets a free lunch from NZ’s water resources.

  4. PsyclingLeft.Always 5

    More from the NACT1 blame book of : It wuz Labour. (RNZ with actual analysis on )

    Why drilling for fossil fuels is not expected to fix our energy crisis

    Jones and the Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, have blamed the 2018 exploration ban for the current state of the gas market.

    "The basic problem is that we don't have enough gas thanks to Labour screwing the scrum by banning oil and gas," Luxon told Morning Report last month.

    Shame Jones, with typical bombast, exclaims, hand on heart it (when hasn't he got his hand on it ?)

    Jones has said the ban, which was implemented to address climate change, was "the most destructive decision in the history of New Zealand's industry."

    The Reality :

    But experts, including the government's own officials, warned the ban was not the main driver behind a lack of investment in gas or New Zealand's high energy prices – and won't be a magic fix for them either.

    Global investment in speculative drilling for oil and gas has been declining since 2014, when the oil price crashed. Since then, oil companies have focused on high-ranking, lower-cost petroleum provinces, putting New Zealand at a "geographical and geological disadvantage" due to its isolation and relatively unexplored status, officials wrote in a Cabinet paper last year.

    Records show that even before 2018, most of the major oil companies had given up their exploration permits and left New Zealand, citing "bad data", high technical risk or better opportunities elsewhere.

    NACT1 were, and are being, told

    The government knows this. Its own advice has acknowledged the plan's flaws and its low certainty of success. "Investments may not all be successful. The risk of failed drilling is high in our mature fields. In the last five years around $1.8 billion has been invested in drilling 58 wells, and this investment has not managed to maintain or increase our gas reserves," MBIE's advice to Jones in March this year said.

    Greenpeace's Russel Norman ( a man I greatly respect)

    "From a climate change point of view, which everyone should be worried about, we can't afford to burn the existing fossil fuels that have already been discovered on the planet," said Greenpeace executive director Russel Norman. "But also, potentially, you are facing liabilities from other countries who are negatively affected by you burning more and more fossil fuels and destabilizing the climate. So it's grossly irresponsible."

    And Consumers Jon Duffy (Ditto) calls it..

    Consumer's Jon Duffy says he doesn't think there's a plan at all. "There's no Plan A. What we are really missing is a national energy strategy."

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/568869/why-drilling-for-fossil-fuels-is-not-expected-to-fix-our-energy-crisis

  5. Dennis Frank 6

    A fun take on the current scene: https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2025/08/03/must-read-in-camera-and-off-the-record-social-media-and-the-epstein-conspiracy/

    podcasts in their aggregate have now equalled conventional broadcast television in terms of viewers and also equalled it in terms of quality of content… The centre of gravity has changed in the last 18 months – away from mainstream media to social media. With that shift goes some of the rules – the courtesies – of mainstream media. The same sort of rules that went out the window when blogging challenged mainstream journalism and political commentary in the mid 2000’s… American comedian Kat Williams, knocking back far too many cognacs on Shannon Sharpe’s Club Shay Shay podcast in January last year, declared 2024 would be the year everything was revealed. He was telling all. The more he drank the more he told. And he told all to the 90.2 million viewers of that podcast episode. The last Superbowl audience was 127 million so the reach of these tales out of school are in a magnitude of that level – higher than any televised political event.

    Reading body language to decode political posturing is innovative:

    The Behaviour Panel podcast of four (3 x US and 1 x UK) body language specialists analysed the White House cabinet meeting where Trump got tetchy on bringing it up and Attorney-General Pam Bondi defended the handling of the Epstein case. They said all the participants – Trump, Bondi and Rubio – didn’t seem to have any stress around the sexual element but exhibited great anxiety whenever intelligence services were mentioned… the reason to cover up is that anything involving a conspiracy can be easily broken by taking out the weakest link.

    People just go missing. The mystery lasts a moment, then everyone moves on. When hell is other people, thing become less hellish when you eliminate hell-raisers. Just taking out the trash, like Israel. Social darwinism works by numbers. Subtract that one over there! Now that one! Democracy is the system for organising the method.

  6. PsyclingLeft.Always 7

    Big Brother….is orange?

    The Trump administration takes a very Orwellian turn

    As the Ministry of trumptruth rewrites History…(and this is the Smithsonian FFS!)

    Analysis – Back in March, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeted at the Smithsonian Institution that began as follows: "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth."

    The order, for example, cited a desire to remove "improper ideology" – an ominous phrase, if there ever was one – from properties like the Smithsonian.

    Those concerns were certainly bolstered this week. We learned that some historical information that recently vanished from the Smithsonian just so happens to have been objective history that Trump really dislikes: a reference to his two impeachments.

    The Smithsonian said that a board containing the information was removed from the National Museum of American History last month after a review of the museum's "legacy content."

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/568885/the-trump-administration-takes-a-very-orwellian-turn

    The orange fascist is getting worse….

    • Maurice 7.1

      It appears that RNZ has not got the full story.

      The "temporary" placard has been removed but will be replaced.

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/03/smithsonian-trump-impeachment-exhibits

      The Smithsonian will include Donald Trump’s two impeachments in an updated presentation “in the coming weeks” after references to them were removed, the museum said in a statement Saturday.

      ………

      “We were not asked by any administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit” about presidential power limits, the Smithsonian statement said.

      ……..

      A label referring to Trump’s impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History’s exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called “Limits of Presidential Power”. The section includes materials on the impeachment of presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to Richard Nixon’s resignation.

      ……..

      “The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum’s standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation,” the statement said. “It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard.”

      Time will tell if the display is replaced.

      • PsyclingLeft.Always 7.1.1

        It may appear that way to you…however a look at the Guardian 2nd header maybe reveals more…(as in, I am sure there is already major Smithsonian pushback against the fascist Trump pressure incl Legal ! )

        Museum denies Trump pressured it to remove references amid concerns that history was being whitewashed

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/03/smithsonian-trump-impeachment-exhibits

        This is maybe where RNZ got the initial story. And it is full…of fascist Trumps attempts to rewrite American History (some already successful : (

        Changes at National Museum of American History come amid president’s push to reshape US cultural agencies

        The move comes as Trump has waged a systematic campaign to reshape federal cultural agencies since returning to power, and issued directives aimed at purging what he categorizes as diversity initiatives and halting new federal appointments.

        Earlier this year, he signed an executive order directing the elimination of “anti-American ideology” across Smithsonian museums and promising to “restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness”. The order specifically targets several Smithsonian facilities for ideological review, including the National Museum of African American History and Culture.

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/01/smithsonian-trump-impeachments

        Also not content with targetting African Americans of today…the fascist Trump is already honouring confederate Generals…..earlier (confederates winning ?!)

        Trump refuses to change Confederate military base names

        Trump tweeted on Wednesday that bases named for Confederate generals "have become part of a Great American heritage, a history of Winning, Victory and Freedom".

        https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/418790/trump-refuses-to-change-confederate-military-base-names

        fascist Trump confederate update…(note the slimy way it has been done !)

        Trump Says Army Bases Will Revert to Confederate Names

        The move would reverse a yearslong effort to remove names and symbols honoring the Confederacy from the military.

        For example, Fort Eisenhower in Georgia, honoring President Dwight D. Eisenhower — who led the D-Day landings during World War II — would revert to the name Fort Gordon, once honoring John Brown Gordon, the Confederate slave owner and suspected Ku Klux Klan member.

        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/10/us/politics/trump-army-base-rename-confederate.html

        There is much more of fascist trumps rewriting of History to suit his racist/political view. Look it up. If you really want the full story…

        • Maurice 7.1.1.1

          Ah! “fascist”

          An imprecise overused and degraded last century buzzword

          Emphasised and repeated ad nauseam to yell “stop thinking!”

          Perhaps it can be explained exactly how an authoritarian populist doing exactly that which his support base ‘democratically’ elected him to do is labelled a “fascist”?

          • PsyclingLeft.Always 7.1.1.1.1

            However you would like to colour it, trump sure looks fascistic…..this from someone who knows him well.

            As Election Nears, Kelly Warns Trump Would Rule Like a Dictator

            John Kelly, the Trump White House’s longest-serving chief of staff, said that he believed that Donald Trump met the definition of a fascist.

            https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/22/us/politics/john-kelly-trump-fitness-character.html

            And obviously events since….even moreso.

            When you start thinking…let us know : )

            • Maurice 7.1.1.1.1.1

              That John Kelly?

              “John Kelly pretended to be a ‘tough guy,’ but was actually weak and ineffective, born with a VERY small ‘brain.’ He had a hard time functioning in a political world, and was truly an exhausted and beaten man when I fired him,” Trump said on Truth Social

              They do day a few intemperate things about each other!

              • PsyclingLeft.Always

                Lol….trump and Truth Social is your thinking? I think…I will leave you to that.

          • Incognito 7.1.1.1.2

            Perhaps it can be explained exactly how an authoritarian populist doing exactly that which his support base ‘democratically’ elected him to do is labelled a “fascist”?

            That sounds remarkably similar to unthinking Coalition apologists when they mention majority, mandate, and Coalition Agreement. As if there’s no [downward] slide once they’re in office and get their greedy little hands on the levers. Their self-entitlement and arrogance grow and turn into hubris and their words & actions become increasingly unhinged.

            https://theconversation.com/the-hubris-arc-how-visionary-politicians-turn-into-authoritarians-262562

            • Maurice 7.1.1.1.2.1

              Thanks for that link. It applies to politicians of all stripes.

              Rather explains the captain's calls/one source of truth/two classes of subjects ("Yip. Yip. That's what it is") of the previous government just as well as the putative behavior of the present …

              My cynicism begins to know no bounds!

              • Incognito

                I have no idea what you think it ‘explains’ but I’m glad to hear that you seem to feel ‘enlightened’ after reading it. BTW, ‘captain’s calls’ weren’t always what you seem to think they were. The term has been overused and misused by MSM to create headlines and by political opponent to create attack lines.

                I hope your cynicism doesn’t cloud your thinking and acts like a cognitive bias; you wouldn’t be the first commenter here on TS to succumb to it.

  7. weka 9

    Yet another court case, this one in Australia, where the sex class of female is being debated. The Sex Discrimination Comissioner is arguing in the High Court that transwomen should be considered female and should be allowed protections of pregnant women.

    In a submission lodged with the court late last week, Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody says the act expressly gives protection to “women” against discrimination on the grounds of a woman’s “pregnancy or potential pregnancy” – which includes “a desire to become pregnant, or that the woman is perceived as being likely to become pregnant”.

    https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/trans-women-should-have-legal-protections-available-to-pregnant-women-court-told/news-story/ae8101d7ef2490572eb8dd2a406148be

    https://archive.ph/UTIQX

    It's true that some TW desire to become pregnant, but they can't, and it's inconceivable that when the Australian Sex Discrimination Act was written in 1984 that the law makers were including the abstract desire of males to be pregnant.

    Trans people have protection against discrimination on the basis of gender identity. What is being tested here is whether trans-identified males should be also protected on the grounds of sex. The UK Supreme Court recently ruled that sex means biological sex for the purpose of discrimination and equality law.

    Why does it matter? Lots of reasons, here's one particular set.NZ hasn't had a test case yet, but LAVA are a Wellington based group of lesbians taking a case to the Human Rights Review Tribunal to establish if gender critical/sex realist views are worthy of protection under our Human Rights Act. LAVA were denied a presence at a Wellington event organised by Wellington Pride. The LAVA stall was going to display a map of Wellington sites of historical, political, and social significance to lesbians.

    At the centre of this is whether lesbians are allowed to exclude trans-identified heterosexual males who say they are lesbian. If society says they are not allowed to do this, then homosexuality ceases to exist in discrimination law.

    • Terry 9.1

      Thanks for posting this, and the links to the article in The Australian. I was just reading about the Sydney Sweeney controversy in the USA where she’s advertising jeans. I’m beginning to believe that we are in a Monty Python movie, and that’s before I start thinking about Trump

  8. PsyclingLeft.Always 10

    Does Nicola ben and jerry Willis know? (Peter Underwood of The Conversation via RNZ article, has many interesting links : )

    'Go woke, go broke' is no longer true. Socially aware capitalism is the future of corporate responsibility

    Analysis: The phrase "go woke, go broke" is often used by critics of corporate social responsibility. It implies that companies face a binary choice: embrace progressive values or pursue profit.

    Midway, I was wary of a Pyramid Scheme..however : )

    We explore this dynamic using academic Archie Carroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility, where economic responsibility forms the foundation for higher legal, ethical and philanthropic obligations.

    More needed. Much more. For Everyone.

    Creating value for everyone

    A central challenge in reconciling these tensions is the definition of profit itself. Traditional corporate law treats profit as the ultimate end of business activity.

    But scholars such as Edward Freeman argue that profit is a precondition for continuity – not an end in itself. As he puts it, profit to a company is like red blood cells to a human: essential for survival, but not the purpose of life.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/on-the-inside/568908/go-woke-go-broke-is-no-longer-true-socially-aware-capitalism-is-the-future-of-corporate-responsibility

  9. Ad 11

    Wow that Verity Johnson column in Stuff today describing Luxon as "leadership filler" is a cold coffin nail.

    • Bearded Git 11.1

      This is the real kicker in the VJ article.

      "Surely, I hear you say, Hipkins will get rolled before the next election? Surely Labour knows that whilst people like Chris Hipkins, they won’t vote him back in. And yes, that’s all true."

      Hipkins remains too closely connected to the poor Labour result in 2023.Labour needs to act now.

      • weka 11.1.1

        yep.

        Left voters relying on National remaining shit is really bad strategy.If National helicopter in a new leader who is charismatic and a good debater, they may get another term

      • Sanctuary 11.1.2

        Bland and ineffective managerial centrist politicians is an external indicator of the bankrupt decadence of late stage neoliberalism, and isn't confined to NZ.

        Kier Starmer is a chinless wonder whose most likely claim to fame will be to be the last ever elected British Labour PM.

        The EU liberal social democracies are largely governed by cowardly and colourless technocrats who spend most of their time living in a gilded cage of poltical denial.

        The Democrats in the United States produce a never ending line of losers like Karmala Harris and establishment dems like Cuomo whilst doing everything they can to prevent change agents like AOC or Mamdani from gaining any power.

        Labour under Hipkins will beat National under Luxon and three year after than Hipkins and Labour will lose to National under Bishop and decay away completely as a mainstream party after that, and Bishop will lose to a far right authoritarian party and Hipkins, Bishop and all the rest of them will end their days arrested on trumped up charges.

        • bwaghorn 11.1.2.1

          will lose to a far right authoritarian party and Hipkins, Bishop and all the rest of them will end their days arrested on trumped up charges.

          Well that turned dark

    • Dennis Frank 11.2

      Interesting that Lux rates 8% below National…

      there’s a real chance this is going to be a one-term government. 76% of us think the economy is doing poorly… Luxon’s preferred PM rating is 24%. Auckland Transport has a higher approval rating than that, sitting on 27%. You know it’s bad when AT is more popular than you are. It’s like being outranked in empathy by Vlad the Impaler. https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360777928/verity-johnson-luxon-filler-text-who-replaces-him

      • Ad 11.2.1

        Unemployment is about to be posted at a 10 year high.

        Inflation is staying high despite the Reserve Bank and this government colluding with massive austerity budgets and higher interest rates.

        Public tax take is dragging future public budgets down into beyond 2030.

        Luxon is shit at his job.

        • Bearded Git 11.2.1.1

          …and they just said on RNZ that Luxon was booed at the netball (which we all knew about) AND the Wearable Arts.

          Trump’s 15% tariffs were another body blow for The Lux. All that sycophancy for nothing.

        • Nic the NZer 11.2.1.2

          Inflation is 2.7% up from 2.5%. Middle of the target band can hardly be considered high.

          • Ad 11.2.1.2.1

            I'm guessing your going to deny that the Reserve Bank deliberately and rapidly slowed the economy down.

            • Nic the NZer 11.2.1.2.1.1

              My understanding would be that a lot of monetary policy decisions don't have much effect on inflation, one way or the other. If we are looking at recent OCR decisions the RBNZ seems to have been trying to accelerate the economy for about a year (decisions lowered the OCR).

              On the other hand though since National has been running very much an austerity budget this is going to dictate the primary direction of the economy, it's certainly the reason for the economy sliding towards recession and unemployment going up by a lot. This is all fiscal, rather than monetary policy choices and what the RBNZ does relating to the overall economy is largely irrelevant to the overall direction of the economy because its comparatively ineffective.

              The other important thing to say is that I think the RBNZ was way too aggressive in raising the OCR in 2022 to begin with. This was due to the causes of inflation at the time. There are some effects there relating to how that imported inflation spreads through the economy and maybe becomes more pro-longed. The main effects of this OCR hike is many rent hikes were implemented which then somewhat compounded the inflation and impacted renters. I don't think this did anything to lessen the NZ inflation rate, if anything it made the inflation episode more prolonged (by generating rent hikes).

              This basically indicates the RBNZ could be equally as aggressive lowering monetary policy without harm, but it's still largely irrelevant compared to the fiscal policy decisions going on. The RBNZ could drop to zero OCR in a single decision and that still won't pull the economy up from its present recessionary trajectory.

  10. aj 12

    A cold hard look at the reality of past history and present times, unfortunately. The tragedy is that countries with strong democratic backgrounds are sliding, and siding, with the dark side of humanity.

    "I’m pessimistic about the future,” he says. “But I’m optimistic about people"

    "History is best told as a story of organised crime,” Kemp says. “It is one group creating a monopoly on resources through the use of violence over a certain territory and population.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/02/self-termination-history-and-future-of-societal-collapse?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

  11. SPC 13

    If cutting the amount of food provided in schools was not enough, the National Party now leaves no doubt, they organise education around the interests of their middle class voters.

    For mine

    Year 11 is too early for NCEA, as it requires too much assessment when the purpose is realisjng an attainment standard.

    But the focus should be on a base standard retained and in more than numeracy/Maths/financial competence and literacy/English/communication. Also some sense of civics (history/social studies), science, languages and trades.

    That should have been done with the age 15 to 16 for school leaving (an opinion I have had for c40 years – the 50% fail of SC left many without any sense of achievement).

    Year 12 and year 13.

    The requirement to take 5 subjects and pass 4, is sort of irrelevant to those on vocational pathways (especially those with periods in on the job training/various academy approaches).

    It seems too middle class in concept (catering to those who want to be set apart from and above their peers). It's just a return to UE and Bursary/Scholarship pass/fail status.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/568917/explainer-what-s-replacing-ncea-and-how-to-have-your-say

    • Karolyn_IS 13.1

      Agree. The old UE & School Cert were a sorting mechanism, sorting society's winners and losers, that roughly equated to middle/upper middle and working class.

      There should be a vocational option in years 12 & 13. I taught on BTec and City and Guilds courses last century in London, to those over 16 years who had failed to get qualifications at school. It's an option that suits many young people.

      BTec Higher National Diplomas also could be used as a qualification to go onto Uni, as well as providing a vocational pathway.