
Open mike is your post.
For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Step up to the mike …

Open mike is your post.
For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Step up to the mike …
Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.
Denial is the last refuge of a scoundrel and Simeon Brown is a sad sack of denials.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/health/1409610/health-minister-simeon-brown-denies-telling-hospitals-to-save-money-as-flu-surge-bites
Simeon Brown and National have been running Health NZ into the ground and preparing the way for privatisation. It’s sickening behaviour.
https://newsroom.co.nz/2026/09/16/millions-in-wasted-roading-projects-are-competing-with-a-starving-health-system/
One hospital.
So many Pitt's in Enzed.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/health/1383934/tauranga-hospital-emergency-department-staff-declare-state-of-emergency
Yup
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/health/1406832/wellington-hospital-closes-off-part-of-corridor-for-extra-beds
Awesome (or awful?) cartoon!
It's a great cartoon – but I think you should link to where you sourced it from. Copyright applies to cartoonists as well as authors.
Just taking it for your post, with no attribution, doesn't really sit well.
Thanks B, that Sharon Murdoch cartoon appeared in several media ‘outlets’ – I sourced it from the Waikato Times, and here’s the link to Murdoch’s 30 August 2026 post on X. Hope this addesses your concern.
https://x.com/domesticanimal/status/2093802121695207844
The cartoon is unlikely to sit well with health minister Brown and PM Luxon
Copyright? What are you talking about? The attribution is in the image itself, are you unfamiliar with signatures?
Your understanding of copyright is lacking.
The cartoonist (or their employer if they are contracted) owns the copyright of a cartoon. They have absolute control over how and where it is reproduced during the copyright period.
Individuals may use part of a copyrighted work for the purposes of review, criticism or reporting (the last would be closest to TS usage), so long as it is properly acknowledged
So, as a minimum, you have to acknowledge where you sourced it from, and (according to TS policy for all quotes) link to that source.
Having said that, it is difficult to see how you can use 'part' of a cartoon (as is required to be covered by the 'fair use' concept). So posting it at all may be technically illegal.
Thanks again B, this time for your warning.
There's a rich vein of political cartoons to mine in the lead-up to the general election. I'll have a go at posting at least one per day on OM – oh what fun.
Sharon Murdoch. Published in the Dom Post, 10 Feb 2012. Ref: DCDL-0020191
Always something to add acidic bite to the dish of the day Belladonna. Lemon in the dressing possibly – great cuisine.
Thanks for the compliment.
https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361037704/cartoon-july-5
This is a scandal-Labour and the Greens need to broadcast it far and wide.
"….the Government has spent nearly half a billion dollars creating business cases for so-called ghost roads that have now been in effect shelved. This includes $323m on Roads of National Significance projects that were quietly abandoned after sustained criticism of their high cost and low value"
Talbot Mills, now known as Anacta, poll last night:
Lab 31 Gre 12 TPM 2 =45
Nat 30 NZF 10 ACT 8 =48
Opp 7
So similar to the Freshwater poll….it all depends on Opp.
But assuming Opp would negotiate first with the largest party (and btw the largest support party-the Greens) the Left would have a working majority; 52-48. In fact Lab/Gre/Opp could form a government on their own.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/labour-slumps-in-another-poll-but-still-ahead-of-national/HDUVF4SBJJHK3LYLGXLVLG3F7U/
National shill Thomas Coughlan makes a desperate attempt to paint this as good news for National, saying it is a Labour "slump". The Nats had an 11.2% lead over Labour at the 2023 election….Labour has now turned this around to a lead of 1%.
The 2% prospective majority in your scenario is well within the margin of error of the polls.
All this poll tells us is that NZ is still deeply divided, and that there is no clear frontrunner in this election.
Too close to call.
Agreed Bella…it's on a knife edge.
There was a post here recently pointing out that National hate the poor. Many examples were given and the premise was proven.
It occurs to me ACT hate workers.
Van Velden, who doesn't appear to have done a weeks hard work in her life, weakened Health and Safety and encouraged Worksafe into a 'education' role away from enforcement role. Undoing the changes made in the long shadow of the horrors of Pike River.
Just heard the same old superannuation drum beaten by ACT about raising the age of eligibility. No notion of increasing funding for it by taxing things such as currency and housing speculation.
And then there is this, freezing minimum wage after it has failed to rise adequately for the last few years.
"The minimum wage rose $1.20 cents per hour in 2022, $1.50 in 2023, 45 cents in 2024, 35 cents in 2025, and 45 cents in 2026."
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361033496/act-pledges-freeze-adult-minimum-wage-lower-youth-training-rate
The poor and the workers will fall further backwards & down if the Coalition gets a second term. Worse, the numbers of poor and under- & un-employed will swell if that happens.
Mining, drilling, burning, fast-tracking, polluting, and pillaging are not enough and meet too much resistance (aka burn too much political capital). So, to pay for their Roads of National Nonsense, National is likely to put asset sales back on the table – it always was waiting in the top-drawer for the Right moment. Of course, and as always, National will not be upfront about their plans and claim their ‘mandate’ after the election.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2609/S00105/simeon-brown-must-come-clean-with-voters-is-national-planning-to-sell-off-the-states-silver-again.htm
https://www.labour.org.nz/news/release-whats-on-luxons-sell-off-list/
https://art.manukabay.co.nz/abode/23/images/2024/23_The-Sacrifice.jpg
Might future asset sales be 'necessary' because of the 6th National (nACTf) govt's failed economic strategy? Private capital's appetite for profit is insatiable – public asset sales allow the sorted to maintain their income streams in increasingly uncertain times.
It's all going to plan.
Brilliant cartoon – so true.
To justify selling NZ assets to foreign interests (usually at fire sale prices) the government will no doubt call on its good friend TINA (there is no alternative).
They've played card before.
National is at pains to deny the accusation of planning to sell assets. Instead, they’ll sell assets in all but name, i.e., leasing it aka ‘asset recycling’.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361033747/luxon-cracked-door-asset-sales-willis-slams-it-shut
National cannot be trusted with our assets.
Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon speaking at the same conference with dire warnings about the massive dangers of unregulated AI systems:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/sanders-bannon-warn-of-ai-dangers-in-rare-us-left-right-alignment/SFKIPEUAR5H7NNTXSIQW7NMKRY/
Bernie and Bannon on the same AI position. That's how dark this is.
Nah all we need is
What a pity the US hasn't got one.
https://www.smoothradio.com/features/worst-quiz-show-answers-ever/ [UK]
https://aeon.co/ideas/what-einstein-meant-by-god-does-not-play-dice
https://x.com/FrankAmari2/status/2099926751132446787
It may be heralded as the Duel of the Deputies but I doubt it’s worth my time listening to Morning Report.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/politics_election-2026/1410174/national-and-labour-deputies-clash-over-health-system
From the little write-up it’s clear, and no surprise from the Minister of Spreadsheets (aka Nicky-no-Boats), that she, just like her boss the Prime Mincer, is still wedded to idea of targets, health targets in this case.
Measuring and achieving targets is an outcome in its own right and often becomes the intention and target by and for itself. It’s a meaningless exercise in futility but National always had too many Target Porn addicts.
Ian Powell wrote this a year ago:
https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/08/15/simeon-brown-places-target-on-patients-heads/
Unfortunately, he was right and by all accounts, Health NZ is closer to the tipping point thanks to the mismanagement and mis-governance by National (and let’s not forget lackey Lester Levy).
It's come to me. Our problem is targets, the present government and others, have all been focussed on the wrong ones. A little? change of angle and perception and they might find us Kiwis in their sights again. But what then? Would they use us as target practice as with Tom Phillips?
National has organised another three way handshake/coalition.
This break-up will be hard to do.
Shared Distribution and Supply Chain
https://www.1news.co.nz/2026/09/16/national-to-pursue-paknsave-new-world-and-four-square-break-up/
April 19 2026.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360966863/nz-first-wants-break-pakn-save-and-new-world
We managed to break up Telecom. If the political will is there (and, IMO, the jury's still out on this) – it can be made to work.
Woolworths Australia board are currently discussing this proposal. They are expected to make an announcement once they stop laughing.
Google Countdown and Woolworths in New Zealand, a history of separation and recombination.
1929 (The Arrival of Woolworths) trading initially as a general merchandise variety store
1981 (The Birth of Countdown) as a large-format discount food market
long story period
Currently both operate here as a single operation Woolworths and are effectively a subsidiary of their Australian arm.
It always seemed strange to me that the commerce commission allowed Countdown and Foodtown and Woolworths to combine.
I always found it amusing that the Australian and New Zealand Woolworths is named after the American Woolworths, but has no other connection to it.
They wouldn't get away with that today. Corporations are very protective of their brand. I guess NZ was just too far away to bother with in the early 20th century.
They've announced the announcement of the conclusions of an investigation.
It doesn't get more action-oriented than that – surely? This is what I would expect from Luxon, a man whose behaviour is most charactised by what I would call "performative high function". That is, he acts in the way that he imagines high-functioning people do. But both his imagination and his acting performance are inadequate.
Stalling for time is an effective tactic used by the tobacco industry, for example, through [seeding] doubt, delay, dilute & diminish, and derail.
Sounds like Labour have a soon to be announced plan of action to bring prices down
Part of the The Post/Freshwater Strategy poll
https://www.thepost.co.nz/politics/361079449/half-voters-say-time-give-chris-hipkins-second-chance
Okay, one last stab at the 'ai is scary-bad' cover-story splashed about by a naughty ai company, this one by tech people who unpick the systemic disregard of safety. Note this blogpost is dated early August, so the company took a long time to work out its spin before dropping it into the public domain.
Not only did OpenAi not properly sandbox their malicious code, they 'Outsourced sandboxing and cybersecurity evaluation, because apparently it’s not important enough to have that in-house… The LLM given the hacking task was not firewalled off completely from the public internet, but had access [via a server]…they forgot to put the actual thing that the LLM was supposed to hack into the sandbox it was in…ran this specific task… over many weeks without noticing that it was completely broken…'
There were apparently no logs kept of the process, or any review of the agent endeavours. After the frustrated agents hacked the server connected to the net and created a noticeboard, OpenAi noticed that, but just stuck on a patch without shutting down the server, and therefore ongoing internet access. It also continued to use the attempts as training data for their LLM.
Naughty, naughty, naughty.
https://www.verysane.ai/p/felonybench-style-points
Additionally, and creepily, there is an actual death-cult within some ai programmers, with weird ideas about transhumanism, etc, from people who have cooked their brains with too much online time and micro-dosing assorted drugs. This is the source of the nihilist message being spread, now in the mainstream media.
'In the worst nightmares of people like Yudkowsky and Bostrom, AI doom looks like an omnipotent version of Hal, the computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey that starts jettisoning humans from a spaceship’s airlock when they conflict with its sense of mission.'
https://www.theguardian.com/global/ng-interactive/2025/mar/05/zizians-artificial-intelligence
So Nicola Willis says that forcing greater splitting of ownership for supermarkets will reduce prices – perhaps she could explain why that does not appear to to apply to the electricity market.
Extra management, duplicating systems costs gives them scope to increase prices.
Yet more spray n walk away BS from the coalition of caos with zero questions from the owned media.
Greens are onto it. You'll only keep them low by offering kiwis a better price.