The Standard

Daily review 05/08/2025

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, August 5th, 2025 - 5 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

5 comments on “Daily review 05/08/2025 ”

  1. SPC 1

    The Foreshore and Seabed law is back.

    The Government is forging ahead with plans to change the law governing New Zealand's foreshore and seabed

    Public domain is back in fashion.

    The Court of Appeal opened the issue back up in 2023

    a 2023 Court of Appeal decision could have made it significantly easier for Māori groups to win recognition of customary rights over parts of the coastline.

    and despite the Supreme Court ruling otherwise, it has not gone away being picked up NZF and now the government.

    Probably to hide the fact that they intend to open up the sale of our taonga – coastal land, lakeside and riverside land to foreigners.

    "Everybody in New Zealand has an interest in what goes on in the coastline, and we're trying our best to get that balance right."

    Did Goldsmith make a submission on changes to OIO legislation?

    https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/08/05/government-forges-ahead-with-foreshore-and-seabed-law/

  2. joe90 2

    Rotten.

    /

    https://www.consumer.org.nz/articles/crimson-education-s-unfair-contract-terms

    @mountaintui.bsky.social‬

    One day after Crimson Education's Beaton appears on Q&A to denounce NCEA, Erica Stanford announces she is cancelling it, ignoring expert advice. The next day John Key, business partner to Beaton, flog off their new course How flaming corrupt are the National Party?

    https://bsky.app/profile/mountaintui.bsky.social/post/3lvmnvjefrk2s

    The Question We Must Ask

    When we choose the future of our education system, whose voice would we rather follow?

    The billionaire consultant who has never taught a day in a New Zealand classroom and profits from fear? Or the teacher who has dedicated his life to nurturing the invisible intelligence of the very students our system risks leaving behind?

    We must be aware of whose opinions – and whose lack of evidence – are informing the dismantling of NCEA. Because the direction we take now will shape the opportunities and aspirations of generations of young people.

    Whose voice is guiding us?

    And is it one we truly trust?

    https://www.engaginglearningvoices.com/post/ncea-s-future-decided-beaton-vs-welby-ings-and-the-pretence-of-consultation

    • SPC 2.1

      Were both Crimson Education and TVNZ in cahoots with the Minister in the publicity to sell the policy?

  3. Muttonbird 3

    Abolishing NCEA has a very similar feel to scrapping iREX. Done without much thought, for ideological reasons, and for promotional purposes in part in order to distract.

    And the result will be the same, we’ll end up with something smaller, narrower, and less capable.

  4. Muttonbird 4

    In Sydney on Sunday 90,000 marched against genocidal pariah state, Israel. The courts sat the NSW Premier and Police, who tried to ban the protest, back down in their seats:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360779375/despite-worst-fears-and-weather-was-day-sydney-took-stand-humanity