Daily review 03/08/2022

Written By: notices and features - Date published: - 12 comments
Categories: Daily review

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

12 comments on “Daily review 03/08/2022”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

    1. 1.1

      Typical norman whinging with out any actual pathways to change , that wouldn't send us to the poor house,

  2. 2

    If someone rushes into your house to warn you that it's on fire, do you ignore them because they didn't tell you how to put it out?

      1. 2.1.1

        It's your house – you should have a plan in case of emergency.

        It's not Russel's responsibility.

        1. 2.1.1.1

          Sorry but that dude just trigger me , hes a whiner,

          My plan has been to support a labour green government for years.

          Btw watched you on YouTube tuther day Nice garden

  5. 5

    So, this is the first time I've seen an alternative proposal from the Council group to the government 3 Waters scheme – in any detail.

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/councils-propose-three-waters-fix-without-co-governance/ESLKSRYBJSRWHVU32QX6A2GPUM/?c_id=1&objectid=12542329&ref=rss

    I would really like to hear (well, read actually) a detailed response from the Govt. to this proposal. Which appears to address the issue (water supply) without either the imposition of multiple layers of bureaucracy or co-governance (both of which are highly divisive at the local level)

Comments are closed.