Daily review 26/07/2021

Written By: notices and features - Date published: - 12 comments
Categories: Daily review

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

12 comments on “Daily review 26/07/2021”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

  1. 1

    It’s great to see that not everybody thinks and acts B & W and that some are making efforts to chip away a path towards a light at the end of the tunnel [this is possibly the worst and most ironic string of metaphors I’ve used in a while].

    This one stood out for me, and a fine example of prefigurative politics:

    “There's no point pointing the fingers at our community leaders and police and asking why aren’t you doing anything, if we’re not willing to get to work and make a change ourselves,” Pope said.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/125852291/police-and-gang-members-attend-community-meeting-in-efforts-to-tackle-gun-crime-in-auckland

    A great grassroots initiative.

    1. 2.1

      I don't get it. Why isn't the negative test status checked before getting on the plane? Isn't the plane a risk for transmission?

      1. 2.1.1

        That's right. Their concerns seem to be about a lack of communication and what happens at the point of entering New Zealand when people aren't aware of the rules, but you'd think that they wouldn't have got to that point if there were proper checks before getting on the plane. No mention of that here. Does that mean no checks are carried out when departing Australia? Not surprising – it's always been a matter of out of sight out of mind for the Australian government.

        1. 2.1.1.1

          I don't follow closely, but seem to remember they're only checking randomly on inbound passengers at the NZ end.

          Do people still need to check in with their airline at the airport before they fly? Or is that automated now?

          1. 2.1.1.1.1

            I don't know. Like you, I saw it strange people could leave Australia without proof of a negative test. What struck me was Ann and Dave blaming the New Zealand government when you'd think they shouldn't have been allowed on the plane in the first place. Sparked my irrational prejudices against Australians.

            1. 2.1.1.1.1.1

              Not sure the Australians can be blamed….my brother visited from Melbourne in May and a couple of days after he arrived I asked how our covid tracer app compared to Aussie's….he replied “what tracer app?”

              He had been through our border and at no time was he asked to download or instructed to use it, he was completely unaware it existed.

                2. 2.1.1.1.1.1.1.2

                  The NZ govt could require all airlines flying into the country to a) check negative test status, and b) inform passengers of NZ requirements around covid (eg awareness of app and how it works, what happens if they get sick or are required to go into MiQ, how to get tested and so on).

    1. 3.1

      Brilliant…thanks Pete…great thread …..what's with that wanker hiding the Jacinda books FFS.

Comments are closed.