PM’s social media advisor lashes out on Twitter

49 comments on “PM’s social media advisor lashes out on Twitter”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

  1. 1

    Mark Textor is also known to take things personally. In response to my post on whether he was working for Fairfax or Fairfax for him, I got this twitter rant and while you might not agree with me or think I am nuts period, it is interesting that one of the members of the team accredited with winning the last election in England, would come down from his high and mighty perch to call me a cokehead conspiracy nutter for asking that simple question.

  2. 4

    Isn’t it great to know that the GCSB has access to all of the NSA’s cyber spying tools.

    1. 5.2

      Social Media ?

      Wasnt that the soup du jour for Whaleoils business. ( Social media Consultants Ltd)

      Online fingerprints ?

      Its that too scary. Must be the GCSB interface with Twitter that allows them to know all this.

  3. 6

    heh, top levellers entering the fray eh,

    I recall when Rob Fyfe was Air NZ CEO (staff were referred to as ā€œAir New Zealandersā€ when he was trying to shaft Zeal), anyway I sent an email as part of a campaign to support SFWU members and he responded to me personally at 2.30am with quite a snarky one

    1. 8.2

      what sexist drivel – there are dozens of males quite adept at social media

      an idiot is an idiot – male, female…. etc

  4. 10

    So does this threatening message come from the Office Of The PM?

    Because as I understand it, when the Office of the PM speaks, that’s the PM speaking.

      1. 10.1.2

        Enough of the hats.

        If this twitter account speaks for his Office, then it’s him.

        The question is ‘which Office?’

    1. 10.2

      In this case they seem to be doing the ‘PM speaking ‘ on social media, so thats a yes!

      But of course , they could be only ‘fooling around’

  5. 11

    “He’s involved in National’s disastrous social media campaign to change the flag. And he seems to be getting pretty angry about it (ht gitso):”

    Compton’s tweet is from the end of March. It was an attack on an activist anti-govt twitter account. I’m not seeing a connection with the social media fiasco tody i.e. Compton was already pissed off at the account before the flag thing.

    1. 12.2

      Very clever, “Realblue”.

      But I know who you really are, and I have the resources at my disposal to keep an eye on you.

      Have a nice day : )

    2. 12.3

      Cut it out you guys, no need for all the fuss. I’ve had a chat with Realblue’s employer and he’s going to sort him out for us. Gone by lunchtime, I reckon.

        1. 12.3.1.2

          Nice play on words. It’s commonly known Curia staffers are independent contractors, it’s part of the aspirational aims of the business, so you’re mainly right.

      1. 12.4.1

        “….the side of the baddies.” I’d sue you for that but as well as being on the side of the baddies, we also have all the money, the sun and wind is at our back.šŸ˜€

  6. 14

    With a name like Gwynn Compton he’s gotta be a twerp. But, as we know, the PM’s Office is full of em.

  7. 15

    ‘

    Heh! Who, in portraying themselves as some kind of PR / Social Media guru, once wrote:

    . . . Roll with the punches, don’t dig deeper: The internet is a fickle beast at the best of times. Often what you put out there isn’t going to be received, interpreted or reacted to in the way you planned. If things don’t go to plan, the worse possible thing you can do is get nasty and get more radical. It only serves to dig you deeper in your hole . . .

    . . . yep, you guessed it.

  8. 16

    ‘

    And, the story has made it to the New Zealand Fox News Herald –> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11446880

    Be interesting to see whether the story appears in the print edition. Claire Trevett may want to emend her comment ” . . . Mr Compton has since locked his Twitter account and removed any reference to Mr Key’s office from his LinkedIn profile . . . ” because Gywnn’s LinkedIn page still has the reference to John Key’s office. Mind you, perhaps Claire was told the reference was removed before Gywnn was told to remove it.

    1. 16.1

      “Mind you, perhaps Claire was told the reference was removed before Gywnn was told to remove it.”

      chuckling

  9. 18

    On a different note, we got a “what do you stand for card?” in our mail box.

    My husband filled it out with “the arrest, trial and imprisonment of the Key Cabinet”.

    and then duly posted it off. Maybe it needs a better airing on this social media outlet.

Comments are closed.