The Standard

Open Mike 27/05/2026

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, May 27th, 2026 - 77 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

77 comments on “Open Mike 27/05/2026 ”

  1. SPC 1

    Imagine placing a 5% tax impost on large banks (tax rate from 28 to 33%, the concept of a progressive tax rate on highly profitable companies) and using it to supply funds to a "Development Finance Corporation".

    We have a culture where small businesses are funded by home mortgages and where companies with a growth future get bought out by foreigners (the lack of a developed venture capital market and affordable finance locally) – because of the nations inclination to focus investment on either private property investment or roads.

    The meeting with Chalmers took place on April 17 and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) described the topic for discussion as “New Zealand potentially joining the Australian Business Growth Fund”.

    A briefing document prepared for her by MBIE last year noted that consultant Deloitte had estimated there were between 500 and 1200 “more traditional” small businesses with revenues of between $1m and $10m that “could not access growth capital”.

    “In 2023, it was proposed that a Business Growth Fund could help fill this gap,” officials advised. “This concept has found success in other jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia.

    “The previous government committed $100m in equal partnership with the four major banks as co-shareholders to establish the New Zealand Business Growth Fund. However, due to competing priorities, discussions with the banks were not progressed through to implementation, and the committed funds were therefore reallocated.”

    If the coalition Government was to revive the idea, one way to pay for it might be to also copy Australia by introducing something similar to its major bank levy on the big four banks.

    https://www.thepost.co.nz/business/361011316/what-could-securing-nzs-economic-future-involve-beyond-fiscal-responsibility

  2. PsyclingLeft.Always 3

    And oh…if only we had a Govt that was on Public Transport, how much better than fkn obviously stupid RONS and the car-go cultism of Simeon…..

    Auckland bus passengers hit record high as fuel crisis bites

    Data from Auckland Transport showed a record number of bus trips in March, with high numbers persisting into April too.

    Public transport advocates said the city and the government should be capitalising on the chance to make the change permanent.

    And Cycling up too : )

    Auckland University urban planning programme director Tim Welch said it was clear from other data that some of the bounce was coming from people getting out of their cars.

    "We know that traffic is likely down about 2.5 percent, so three million fewer trips [by car] this April compared to last April, across a sample of sites with traffic monitoring."

    Along with more bus passengers, cycling trips at a set of monitored sites had jumped by about 20 percent last month, too, Welch said.

    advocate Matt Lowrie (whose opinion I respect and value..

    "Auckland actually has probably the best bus network in Australasia," he said.

    The weekend numbers had been increasing for a while, "and they're getting stronger as a result of the fuel crisis as well".

    Auckland Transport should be doing more to capitalise on that.

    "People just assume it's going to be slower, and so there's probably more that can be done around encouraging off-peak use," he said.

    "That's really where our public transport system needs to be, where it's used well all day for a whole range of trips, not just your commuting from, commuting to the city."

    And shouldn't this be obvious..to any Govt that thinks? (well of course that precludes Incumbent Idiot Ideologues!)

    Tim Welch said the government had chosen the wrong focus for its fuel conservation campaign, which urged motorists to 'stretch every tank'.

    "When the main messaging is check your car boot to make sure it's not full and pump up your tyres, that's really the government just assuming and messaging that cars are your number one choice," he said.

    "We do have this very reliable and, luckily, heavily electric public transport system that's running in the background that could be used a lot more as well."

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/environment/596321/auckland-bus-passengers-hit-record-high-as-fuel-crisis-bites

    • PsyclingLeft.Always 3.1

      IMO pertinent to this….I recently (of course article is earlier : ) discovered that the so called BP roundabout project has ballooned to double initial cost, now maybe $250 Million.?!

      I note its now ex Mayor Lewers…himself a cost over run, and oh, of course the mini-minister Simeon has blamed… Labour FFS !

      $250m Queenstown highway upgrade does less with more

      I note a prescient comment (Newsroom comments always interesting)

      Dr Peter Carey says:

      29/05/2024 at 8:46 pm

      Short of a double lane highway, which would be extremely expensive, they’re going to struggle to speed up a continuous single lane of traffic so they are deluding themselves to think that a bit of widening here and there will make much difference. It just slows at the next bottleneck but then this Government is so myopically driven by the personal car they’ll just waste $250M on a vanity project, money better spent on park and ride and running a continuous bus service. A bit of congestion pricing wouldn’t go amiss either

      https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/05/29/250m-queenstown-highway-upgrade-does-less-with-more/

      I fail to see how throwing $250 Mill at a roundabout is going to fix this ?….Because the fkn roads to, and from, and the Shotover River bridge !

      IMO its just more car-go cultism by Simeon….

      • Graeme 3.1.1

        The Frankton roundabout (the intersection was a shit long before BP landed there and will be long after they realise there's better sites for their trade) has become poster child for our poor planning of roading and what's under them. Most of the $250 million is dealing with services under the road and hopefully future proofing them to some extent. Then there was a lengthy exercise in figuring out how they were going to build the thing and kinda maintain traffic flow through the intersection. It's also a lot more than just a roundabout, work goes several hundred metres each side and includes a new bus interchange.

        https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/queenstown-package

        At least at Frankton most of the services were fairly new and in kinda known locations, with the last major project here, the Melbourne St Bypass (aka Road to Nowhere) underlying infrastructure was much older, some going back to late 1800's, with very sparse recording up until really this century. This naturally turned into a bit of a nightmare. In the end we've ended up with dramatically reduced congestion surrounding central Queenstown, and brown fields redevelopment in Gorge Road from school and industrial to fairly high density appartments.

        It's unfortunate that the reporting and consequent discourse on these projects just focuses on the visible parts, and then just the bit cars are driven on, what is under the road is of no consequence. Hence our problems with 3 waters infrastructure nation wide.

        Government is at least making a belated and token gesture to the problem of ghost services, giving $2.5 million for a review of the situation. Business Desk link https://archive.is/a9sZ7

        • PsyclingLeft.Always 3.1.1.1

          The Frankton roundabout

          It's unfortunate that the reporting and consequent discourse on these projects just focuses on the visible parts, and then just the bit cars are driven on, what is under the road is of no consequence.

          Ah you might have forgotten ?…I used to actually live and work there. And still sometimes rarely …and reluctantly, have to travel to same

          (and FYI, I have commented many times on Qtown and its ongoing $Million $hitfests)

          And FFS… several hundred metres ?! What about my points of the roads to and from? And the Shotover Bridge ? IMO seems like you're running a bit of defense here ?…

          It's also a lot more than just a roundabout, work goes several hundred metres each side and includes a new bus interchange.

          Years back…I had much involvement with Surveying. Incl of the old one lane Kawarau bridge.Both before and after the new Super Bridge..which was supposed to eliminate stoppp…slowgo, And a lot of the new Frankton Industrial area. There was supposed to be a bypass road….going to the Airport and New Bridge.

          So I know the History.

      • Bearded Git 3.1.2

        "Gone are some bus lanes and bus priority measures between Lake Hayes, through Frankton, and on to Queenstown’s town centre, along State Highways 6 and 6A."

        This is another COC FU. Without bus lanes Queenstown's traffic, which is already a disaster, will only get worse. I live near Wanaka-everybody over this side of the hill avoids driving to Queenstown like the plague.

        There was a story in the local media a couple of weeks ago about a guy who bought a dinghy and outboard to get from Kelvin Heights to his job in central Queenstown because this took 15-20 minutes where to drive would take him over an hour.

        • PsyclingLeft.Always 3.1.2.1

          There was a story in the local media a couple of weeks ago about a guy who bought a dinghy and outboard to get from Kelvin Heights to his job in central Queenstown because this took 15-20 minutes where to drive would take him over an hour.

          Aye BG…there were, and have been, similar stories for decades. At different stages some have operated water taxi's..

          Even people biking to and from same (of course the Rise of the Ebike has made this very achievable, and the Trail is good..done it many times. Lot more Bikes now, but ! : )

          I can only agree : avoid the Qtown AKA Greed Capital of NZ

          And pouring money into it? IMO just more wa$te to help Joseph Money Mooney and fellow Nat$…

          The present state of it….(IMO been much the same for decades now : (

          Fears of 'zombie' town as Queenstown reaches breaking point

          https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regions_otago/596428/fears-of-zombie-town-as-queenstown-reaches-breaking-point?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

        • Graeme 3.1.2.2

          Consequences is going to crash National's Queenstown party very shortly and it's not going to be pretty. Development ahead of infrastructure, and developers who don't give a shit, is very high risk.

          There's a Fast Track thing moving forward at Arrow Junction that will be the size of Arrowtown, and larger once surrounding properties follow. Effects on transport, water supply and disposal, along with landscape will be profound. This quote from the traffic report typifies the developers attitude, quoting from the Crux piece linked above

          Commenting on SH6 congestion they say: ‘Some traffic congestion at peak times is normal in every successful city and every town that is growing to eventually become a city. If drivers do not like sitting in a queue, then they can either travel at a different time or choose to live and work in closer proximity.’”

          Not a great fan of this proposal, but it may have more going for it than any of the others to accommodate that level of demand. Unfortunately Fast Track doesn't directly allow that discussion and it's getting to comparing degrees of stupid.

          But back to consequences. Whakatipu traditionally, going back generations, has had a down turn / clean-out about every 7 years, had one 1988, 1993, 2000, and a good one in 2008. We should have had one in 2019 but covid and Labour's economic lifelines, then the 2022 property boom kept things steaming along. Now Queenstown and surrounding are the only show in the country. This is obviously going to unwind, economically and socially (and probably criminally). A few comments by our Mayor at the end of this ODT piece today

          https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/queenstown/zombie-town-fears-queenstown-reaches-breaking-point-rnz

          Mayor Glover also has concerns for developers, who are "coming in from a flat-lined Auckland housing market", hoping to strike property gold down south.

          "We have seen a lot of developers come down to this district and pay a lot of money at very, very inflated prices for land, and that will either result in some very, very expensive properties or some quite significant risks in some of those developments.

          "So, that's a bit of a black cloud on the horizon – people paying more for the land than it is worth."

      • Ad 3.1.3

        What you get for your $250m in Frankton is as Graeme states:

        – a full rebuild of all the stormwater networks including massive treatment facilities before stormwater gets to the swales, and then trickles into Lake Wakatipu, plus stormwater branch lines to enable development close to the SH6 highway

        – a big upgrade of all the power cabling, which enables for future growth into the QAC 10 year masterplan, the capacity for power for the big new snow machines, expansion of Queenstown Events Centre, and a lot more suburban growth

        – Fibre optic cable upgrade, again catering for future growth.

        – A full network of traffic lights from Grant Road, and shortly to include Howard's Drive

        – You will also have seen that Queenstown is getting a large new cycleway with a 52 metre bridge separating cyclists over the state highway

        – A more-than doubling of the Frankton Bus Hub capacity and size

        No it will definitely not cure traffic in Queenstown, since traffic volumes are increasing about 5% a year and at peak about 46,000 vehicles go around the existing roundabout per day. Queenstown is in reality a small city; it just doesn't want to accept that yet.

        • Graeme 3.1.3.1

          I'm in awe at what's been achieved at Frankton without making traffic worse than it was. Hopefully the lights will be smart enough to handle Frankton's rapidly changing traffic flows.

          I think Queenstown has accepted / embraced that it's a small, very different, and very confined city, and has been for a while. Not so sure Government, of either stripe, gets either the city or confined bit, and definitely don't get the different bit.

          • Mercurio 3.1.3.1.1

            I lived and worked in Frankton back when The Golden Ace was a thing. The whole place is a Special Economic Zone and always has been. A gambler would say, "All bets are off!". Expect the unexpected, the unpalatable, the unrepeatable and don't measure anywhere else against the Gold Hole.

        • PsyclingLeft.Always 3.1.3.2

          Queenstown is in reality a small city; it just doesn't want to accept that yet.

          I bet some dont. IMO they would be the ones standing on top of the pyramid.

          Queenstown (and as I say lived and worked there for decades 90's…10's in Survey/Construction/Building etc) should NEVER have been let able to get beyond what was essentially a horse and cart town design…without Developers having to front up the necessary streets/roads.

          Of course that didnt happen… because reasons incl the huge greed money involved in the adjacent properties and, IMO, influence over QLDC et al…

          And re the $250 Mill…(yes yes I'm sure its all been justified by the involved parties)….none of which addressed my points of….

          the roads to and from? And the Shotover Bridge ?

          The subdivisions on Ladies Mile (which I also worked on)….where was the forward thinking/Engineering there? They all knew how big these were projected to be….and ending up funnelling out onto a… 2 lane high speed highway?

          As I say, I have worked at the Operator end of more than a few of these masterful Engineering designs.

          Quite often the talk was…do they know what the fuck they are doing? It.wont.work.

          Oh re Roundabouts. One near Cromwell a while back…..

          Cromwell's expensive new roundabout to be ripped up due to fault

          https://crux.org.nz/crux-news/cromwells-expensive-new-roundabout-to-be-ripped-up-due-to-fault

          And more recently….

          Contractor awarded $5m Wānaka roundabout after Cromwell mistakes

          https://crux.org.nz/crux-news/cromwell-faults-contractor-gets-5m-wanaka-roundabout-build

          Anyway thats my Input.

  3. Mercurio 4

    Shane Jones, on the way to the House yesterday, carrying a big, live crayfish, gifted to him by Ngāi Tahu – what's that all about (aside from big-noting and boasting)? What's he signalling, and to whom? Seems like some inter-tribal thing to me…

    • Graeme 4.1

      At least Matua is openly declaring the donation / consideration. Wonder if someone hasn't?

      • Mercurio 4.1.1

        Nice thinking, Graeme. He might be publicly demonstrating his transparency, symbolically, so he can refer back to the moment and say, see, the Mātua has clean hands. He did make the point, pointedly, that he was going to check to see whether his gift would qualify as gifting, needing to be declared. I'll watch on with interest.

    • Incognito 4.2

      Shane doing his usual willy-waving which is why he didn’t use crabs because that would have caused a real itch with the public.

    • Binders full of women 4.3

      I saw it.. koura that size aren't great eating… like big old snapper/tamure

  4. Sanctuary 5

    Presumably the crayfish was there to raise the IQ on the government benches.

  5. Drowsy M. Kram 6

    Rent's king, it makes my heart sing… Willis was just standing up for what's right.

    Willis regrets saying those in social housing had ‘won the Lotto
    [1News, 21 May 2026]
    "I reached for the wrong metaphor… I will not be using that phrase again."

    No fear, fair Lady Willis won't be using her "won the Lotto" metaphor again – 'twas merely a wee "Slip of the Soul." What? Yes, of course she has one. Nooooooooo, she doesn't hate poor people, it's simply that when one’s priority is maximising assorted landLord profits, the social housing budget is always on one's mind. Move-On!

  6. ianmac 7

    Managing the Economy is not the same as running the household finances. This seems true but Ganesh Ahirao makes the detail clear. So why does Willis get away with bluffing us.

    And Ganesh covers the bluffs that are used currently by Willis:

    1 We must balance the Budget

    2 We must move to surpluses to ensure we are ready for future shocks or surprises

    3 We need to provide relief for New Zealanders facing the cost-of-living crisis.

    4 This (insert policy option) will hurt the economy

    5 We can’t afford it

    6 The economy is in (was left in) dire straits and we are prioritising its recovery.

    I can manage these clear explanations put up by Ganesh, a review of a 2024 post.

    https://ganeshnana.substack.com/p/encore-appearance-for-budget-2024

    [tidied up link – Incognito]

  7. Bearded Git 8

    There was a discussion this morning on RNZ re the roll-out of EV chargers in NZ. This government's well documented anti-EV drill baby drill philosophy has resulted in the ratio of EV's per charge point being by far the worst among developing countries. Putting Simeon Brown in charge of this has been like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.

    Labour needs to have a strong policy on this.

    See the graph in the link for details, but here are sample ratios in 2025:

    NZ 88 Australia 41 Canada 38 USA 34 China 31 France 27 Spain 27 UK 23 Japan 19

    Germany 15 Sweden 14 South Africa 12 Holland 6

    https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2026/electric-vehicle-charging-chap-6-and-10

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/2019036786/numbers-of-public-ev-chargers-lagging-in-new-zealand

  8. greywarshark 9

    Good for Dame Therese. A leader to follow – please note you other comfortably off people.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/596424/i-m-happy-to-pay-a-higher-tax-rate-says-asb-and-air-new-zealand-chair-dame-therese-walsh

    Politics Regions 4:50 am today (Wed. 27/5/26)

    ‘I'm happy to pay a higher tax rate’ says ASB and Air New Zealand chair Dame Therese Walsh.

    She may not have a strong view on a capital gains tax, but business leader Dame Therese Walsh is willing to share one clear view on the tax system as a whole: she's happy to be paying more.

    "I've had a great career, I can pay my bills, I own my home, and I want a tax system that lifts all New Zealanders up, that's what I want," Walsh tells RNZ's 30 with Guyon Espiner in the first episode of a new season launched on Wednesday.

    The existing tax system lifts people up "in some parts", she says. "I think there are other parts that maybe need to be looked at and are being debated in the political arena right now...

  9. covid is pa 11

    If our politicians want to keep their entitlements, I suggest they do the same for many NZers. And I am not just talking about benefits or accommodation supplements what about ACC entitlement such as the loss of potential earnings. I say this as I know many people are not being informed of their entitlement. This current government has made it so difficult to get, and, in many cases, people are either denied LOPE or reduced to a pittance payout.

  10. Incognito 12

    A lobbyist comments about lobbying [of politicians] from her perspective. She does an awesome job of being objective, impartial, and reasoned but her final two sentences carry a lot of unspoken meaning & message.

    Where the government continues to remain silent on lobbying reform, the market could step in.

    The days of little black book advocacy should be well and truly over.

    https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/27-05-2026/lobbying-shouldnt-be-done-in-the-shadows

    • AB 12.1

      Ah – so when the State is a swamp of potentially corrupt and anti-democratic opacity, market actors from the private sector can step up as the paragons of democratic transparency who protect the public? We can thus valourise the people who are the source of the problem (lobbyists), and smear the State as intrinsically untrustworthy, irrespective of which political actors are in control of it. It's not about simply voting in a better government, but about placing more trust in lobbyists. A cunning reversal of reality – the State doesn't regulate a private sector which has incentives to behave badly, instead, an heroic private sector regulates the always corrupt State.

      • greywarshark 12.1.1

        Finding our way through the a-mazing task of seeing through the fog of misapprehensions! But Harry Potter did it and fought Voldemor. The Potter books weren't just children' stories of fantasy; admit it, we live it.

      • Incognito 12.1.2

        It’s always been a somewhat incestuous relationship between lobbyists and National-led governments. I’d start with modest regulation (no capital “r”) and introduce a mandatory register. Lobbyists must provide their name, passport, and full biometric details and the host must do the same – DNA samples will be matched against each other and known & unknown databases (incl. criminal records and register of failed companies). In addition, all lobbyists must open all their social media accounts and unlock all electronic devices (incl. storage devices) upon entering Parliament buildings.

  11. newsense 13

    It’s pretty good this finance minister job.

    Arrived on Monday.
    Somebody had ordered brand new toilets. What extravagance.I cancelled them. Money saved! I’m so good at this.

    Arrived on Tuesday. There a strong smell from the room where we keep the buckets, before we empty them. There’s too many people running around who don’t ever wear suits. I shit-canned a few janitors. I announced more firings soon. It’s how you run a business. Peow! Peow! Yes I did do finger guns. God I’m tough.

    Wednesday came around. We’ve opened another room and put a lock on the first room, with a notice telling people never to go there.

    Thursday the boss dropped by to ask when the new toilets were arriving. Been part of a really good bulk order deal apparently. I told the ratio was looking good.

    Friday I took some decisive action. I closed a bunch of public toilets near the office.
    ‘Public toilet users have won the lottery!’ I said. ‘No more freeloaders.’

    The boss sent his 2IC round to do some crisis management. (What crisis? I thought. I’m absolutely nailing it!!). He has decided to order 100 new buckets pronto. We need them the second room is almost full.

    with apologies to Steve Braunias.

  12. Incognito 14

    Coalition MPs continue ‘betting’ on the safety of houses.

    MPs from National, New Zealand First and Act have purchased or built at least 25 new rentals, investment properties or second homes since changing tax and tenancy laws to favour landlords.

    […]

    No opposition MPs have added new rental or investment properties to the register this term …

    https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/27-05-2026/government-mps-acquired-25-extra-investment-properties-after-passing-pro-landlord-reforms

    Great job by The Spinoff!

    No wonder that the Coalition has cut back on investing in Science and R&D in NZ because it doesn’t fit in their belief-system for unleashing this country’s potential and making it prosper (aka ‘The Plan’).

    • SPC 14.1

      One wonders how many investments there would have been if the housing market was not flatlining because of the exodus to Oz, aka not a well managed economy.

      • Graeme 14.1.1

        Probably considerably fewer.

        The course of events / plan has been to cash out at the top of the market, institute austerity policies, crash employment and housing market, buy back in at the (hopefully) bottom and profit happily ever after.

        Gotta do it with property though, if they tried the same sort of shit on the share market they'd go down for insider trading.

  13. SPC 15

    The mortgage cost outlook is not promising.

    Rates seem likely to go up before the RB acts.

    https://www.1news.co.nz/2026/05/27/significant-turning-point-for-home-loans/

  14. Mercurio 16

    "The government has backed down on a last-minute law change regarding homeschooling after a community backlash."

    Community? Which community, the "homeschool community? How are they so powerful? Do they represent a voting force that National has to keep happy? Are they more powerful than the Māori community? The environment community?

    Really odd news.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/education/596484/government-backs-down-on-last-minute-homeschooling-law-change

    • PsyclingLeft.Always 16.2

      Backlash ! There must be tens of thousands of them thar militant home skoolers !

      alarm from the sector who said the changes – without any consultation – would give the state too much power over what happens in people's homes.

      Nah, not at all. Just a subset of the Charter School set. IMO Its all in line with NACT1 Ideology. Which trumps Rationality….

      • Mercurio 16.2.1

        Gotta keep'em on the hook!

      • Incognito 16.2.2

        Not quite tens of thousands, I reckon.

        As at 1 July 2025, there were 11,010 homeschooled students. These students belong to 6,518 families and represent 1.3% of total school enrolments.

        Out of the 11,010 homeschoolers 61.7% were aged 12 or under, 75.1% had been home-schooled for less than 5 years, and only 3.7% had been home-schooled for 10 years or more.

        https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/homeschooling

        I couldn’t possibly comment about their militant status – they may or may not carry water-pistols.

        • PsyclingLeft.Always 16.2.2.1

          Well, that number surprised me ! And lol , water pistols… possibly Nerf Guns for the more hip ? : )

        • Mercurio 16.2.2.2

          Boil on the bum but what percentage are Ardern-haters?

          • Incognito 16.2.2.2.1

            I think Ardern was at peak hate shortly after she resigned and it then transferred quickly & smoothly to Hipkins. So, it would be very difficult for young hatesters to make the distinction.

          • Mercurio 16.2.2.2.2

            I hear just now, that it was "advice" from New Zealand First that convinced Stanford to do as the homeschoolers demanded. Winston wants the cooker-vote.

            • Matiri 16.2.2.2.2.1

              Quite a few mums in my small rural town decided to home school in protest at the Covid policies adopted by our school, who didn't have any choice but the 'discussions' got very nasty.

            • gsays 16.2.2.2.2.2

              FYI, members of our family have gone down the home school path. Three main reasons, the one on one time is vastly larger at home, one child had a few learning difficulties and living rurally.

              Not a cooker amongst them, all enthusiastic members of the team of 5 million.

              This is what I was referring to the other day. Because a group doesn't align with certain 'values', the othering snowballs and the pejoratives flow.

              Not attractive at all.

              • Incognito

                The strong and visible support from Winston Peters should give you some pause. One could re-appropriate the word and argue cooker = NZF voter, but I agree that such generalisations are simplistic, lazy, and ultimately counter-productive. However, if the shoe fits …

              • Mercurio

                Winston wants the cooker vote. He'd like to have the homeschooler vote as well. Winston wants all the disaffected votes. I didn't say the homeschoolers are cookers. The cookers are watching Winston to see if he supports the home schoolers. I have many, many homeschool friends (you'd be surprised) whom I interact with every day; they are not "other" to me. The "othering" hasn't snowballed and "pejorative" refers to disapproval and disrespect, both of which are valid positions to take with regard some of the people who got over-wound by the Government's requirements around the vaccine.

  15. Mercurio 17

    Ignoring wise advice…

    "Justice officials advised the government not to intervene in a court case being taken against major emitters, offical documents show."

    Despite that, the government announced it would…

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/596461/officials-told-government-not-to-intervene-in-a-climate-court-case

    • PsyclingLeft.Always 17.1

      IMO ignoring any advice that doesnt fit their Ideological/Closeminded drive for the absolute best future…. for the 1%ers.

      And Chloe once again front footing them….(Chloe,Marama, et al Great Greens : )

      Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick says Emissions Trading Scheme auctions are failing because the government has "consistently undermined confidence and certainty in its climate policies".

      The party is pointing to Treasury's financial statements showing eight of the last 10 carbon auctions have failed to clear since the government took office, and the $1.4b is the sum of the volume effect across the years ended 30 June 2024, 2025 and 2026.

      Call them out, Chloe !

      "Luxon's government shredded climate policy when they came to office, telling us all to not worry about it, because the market would sort it out. Then they broke the market. Now they've quietly borrowed more than a billion dollars to cover their tracks.

      "Can we finally stop letting the National Party pretend they're 'good economic managers'?" Swarbrick said.

      https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/596426/nicola-willis-rejects-chloe-swarbrick-s-claim-failed-climate-policies-created-1-point-4b-hole

  16. Mercurio 18

    "In our view, it would be premature to consider policy reform while relevant court proceedings are still underway," the briefing said."

    What would Freud say about that, I wonder…

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/596461/officials-told-government-not-to-intervene-in-a-climate-court-case

    • AB 18.1

      It would have been interesting to see what sort of decision the Court reached if the case had been allowed to finish. There are surely a couple of problems in reaching any sort of determination:

      • It's clear that Z Energy and Fonterra have externalised some of their costs of production onto taxpayers by exacerbating severe weather events with CO2 emissions and causing infrastructure damage that is costly to repair. But how do we calculate the portion of that liability that was contributed by each of them? The damage incurred was produced by emissions from every global emitter over a couple of hundred years. How do we disaggregate the Z and Fonterra contributions?
      • How do we calculate the degree to which CO2 emissions have amplified the damage caused by natural weather events? Because it is only that amplification for which Z and Fonterra are partially liable.

      My (totally layman) guess is that the Court would have seen these problems and made some neutral decision that would have thrown the problem back to legislators to fix. Then we would have been in a much better place as a country to have a proper discussion about what to do. Instead, we just get a reflexive 'business-friendly' decree that shores up the status quo for a bit longer. It's partisan procrastination.

    • Drowsy M. Kram 18.2

      Officials told government not to intervene in a climate court case
      [careful now RNZ, 27 May 2026]

      … Swarbrick told RNZ the government decision to cut off New Zealander's right to hold major polluters accountable for their emissions gets "unhinged" with every new piece of information revealed.

      "Despite Ministers arguing this was critical for business confidence, their official advice is clear that there was no clear business perspective available nor sought to come to such a conclusion.

      "There were warnings this could lead to more litigation, not less, may not even cut costs, and was deeply dangerous in breaching the rule of law and applying retrospectively."

      Solid stuff from RNZ political reporter Lillian Hanley, and she's still digging.
      What, if anything, will ‘Justice’ Minister Gold$mith have to say. Follow the money.

      Climate briefing note sent to PM's chief policy adviser, it has been revealed [be very very careful now RNZ, 27 May 2026]

      The staffer who received a document from Fonterra and Z Energy – that made suggestions for a potential law change – was a senior adviser in the Prime Minister's Office.

      The Prime Minister's chief policy adviser Matt Burgess received the briefing note, which had been delivered in hard copy in mid-2024.

      Burgess was in the role in the Prime Minister's office between January 2024 to October 2025, and had previously worked at the New Zealand Initiative think tank as senior economist.

      When approached for comment, Burgess told RNZ he had nothing to add.

      Hmm, "nothing to add", i.e. nothing to say, hear or see here – Move-On!

  17. Bearded Git 19

    Bishop is at it again, shouting his mouth off at a public meeting with no evidence. Clearly the Local Water Done Well policy is not working as he anticipated.

    “I [Bishop] would potentially put it to you that not all of it is related to water infrastructure,” Bishop can be heard saying in an audio recording of the event sent to the Herald. "I’ve seen the figures, and the debt mountain that’s been transferred into Wellington Water Tiaki Wai is neatly correlated with things like the Town Hall restoration project.

    But the council has strongly rejected Bishop’s accusation, with chief strategy and finance officer Andrea Reeves questioning what evidence the minister was relying on for the claim.“It’s simply not true that we are transferring town hall debt to Tiaki Wai, that’s not correct,” Reeves told the Herald.

    The way Wellington City Council managed its debt was in one consolidated pool on its balance sheet, Reeves said, meaning it was impossible to itemise debt to specific projects and spending areas.“Basically we looked at our balance sheet and we said this is the amount of assets we own, 33% of that relates to water, here’s the debt that we own, let’s transfer 33% of that."

    Paywalled:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/wellington/chris-bishop-claims-wellington-city-council-offloaded-town-hall-debt-into-water-entity-officials-say-simply-not-true/TI64TK6A25EXDDHQSJRNZRYLTQ/

    • SPC 19.1

      Wellington City Council reminds that of the government before accounting was "required" to accommodate sinking lid policy in the 1970's.

      Less politely – Wellington water assets reminds of the GFC era (loading in bad debts with actual value assets – high maintenance costs etc).

      Wellington City (hill metering instalment) is also the reason the cost of water meters would be so high, the cost charged to the new company and paid off by the wider region of water users.

  18. Mercurio 20

    Chlöe is giving the PM a good luxxing in the House today 🙂

    • Incognito 20.1

      Is she roughing his comb-over?

    • SPC 20.2

      An economist specialising in climate change and energy issues out of the NZ Initiative stable was the senior policy advisor.

      The distraction over their identity in the House seems silly (more about form in parliament) than substance given this was determined by media an hour before parliament Question Time.

  19. Tony Veitch 21

    Wow! Debbie Narewa-Packer has just delivered a powerful speech in the General Debate – TPM will tax the rich!

    Great stuff.

    Worth linking to when it comes on line.

Leave a Comment