The Standard

Open Mike 25/06/2026

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, June 25th, 2026 - 84 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

84 comments on “Open Mike 25/06/2026 ”

  1. SPC 1

    An explainer.

    The amount of conservation land that can be sold is going up from 2.4 to 5.2 hectares (there is 8.5 hectares if it)

    The bill is open for public submissions until 2 July.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/politics/620338/explainer-could-the-conservation-amendment-bill-really-lead-to-billionaires-buying-up-the-national-estate

    • Wynston 1.1

      You mission the "million" before hectares!

      • SPC 1.1.1

        The objective was to turn it down a notch from millions to hectares …

        Forest and Bird did the heavy lifting.

        $60M worth is only hectares.

        Greenpeace raises other concerns.

        https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/politics/620847/controversial-clause-in-conservation-amendment-bill-that-allows-sale-of-conservation-land-to-be-removed

        • Wynston 1.1.1.1

          A hectare is equal to 2.471 acres. One acre is four times the size of theoriginally standard quarter acre residential section. The land area involved in the proposed bill was/is millions of both acres and hectares!

          • SPC 1.1.1.1.1

            The actual point was that they wanted to raise $60M or so each year for spending by selling land.

            That amount of money is raised selling hectares of land, not millions of hectares.

            • Wynston 1.1.1.1.1.1

              While he said that it was "expected to raise around $60 million a year" the issue is that it would be ongoing ad infinitum, would open up most conservation land for sale consideration, and they could always decide to increase the rate of sale, and change the purposes to which the proceeds are put. They've done it before. The International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy funds are meant to be split between conservation initiatives to protect native species and the environment, and tourism infrastructure to maintain the facilities visitors use. They are giving $5.7 million of them to the Michelin Guide so it can deploy secret inspectors at some select restaurants and produce a guide to them. That is $5.7 million funds intended for basic tourism infrastructure and conservation being reallocated for international marketing and fine dining!

              • SPC

                There was plenty of land sitting in that category already (without adding any), if it was about $60M a year.

                The big thing seems to be that private groups want to access the use of the land, not buy it.

                That is the more pressing issue apparently – then it is about why – recreational use might well be consistent with conservation land status and its continued protection.

                They could ask for covering of cost (process and oversight and protection of the land) from those allowed access – $60M + etc.

                That said this is just wrong*. Just have a focus on enabling access for public use.

                The biggest is the addition of a new, overarching consideration the Department of Conservation (DOC) has to account for when making decisions.

                It must put economic opportunities front and centre*.

                Potaka expects the changes in the bill will result in much needed funds.

                The bill also speeds up permissions for certain types of activities on conservation land, with the introduction of pre-approved activities. Up to 30 to 40 percent of applications will no longer need to be individually processed, Potaka suggests. These activities include things like collecting air or water for scientific research purposes, and numerous types of commercial recreation activities, such as guided walking, biking and horse-trekking trips.

                • Wynston

                  You overlook that the development or use of such things such as mining, private luxury lodges, and farming/grazing will have to be accorded the same, if not higher, prority as conservation. Such uses are private alienation in all but name.

                  Potaka says he will remove the sale and exchange provisions from the Bill but they remain there until they actually are.

                  I await implementation of his promise with interest but won’t hold my breath on the changed proposals not being introduced until the Commitee of the House stages to avoid select committee consideration and public input!

                  The whole Bill is an abomination and needs to be withdrawn and rewritten!

  2. Dennis Frank 2

    There's been rumblings on the right awhile now. Not quite an antiTrump surge, but worth a look at this advocate's disaffection on matters of principle:

    Tucker Carlson said there was no chance he would ever support the Republican Party again. The clip went viral on Monday. He would not back the Democrats either, he added, and “did not know what he would do” when the next American election came along. After 35 years of defending the party, he said, there was no defending it now: it had just become too immoral. “I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.” https://unherd.com/newsroom/will-tucker-carlson-break-the-gop/

    A Pew survey conducted in late March found that 57% of Republicans under 50 now hold an unfavourable view of Israel, up from 50% a year earlier.

    What Carlson has not built, and may not bother to build, is the machine that turns a grievance and an audience into a small-but-potent faction to the Right of the House Freedom Caucus, and its Trump-supporting members such as Jim Jordan and Lauren Boebert. A presidential run within the GOP in 2028 would likely break MAGA

    What players like this ought to consider is civil war on the right of politics. Is it really a good look? Posturing is all very well, but people are more impressed by action.

    • SPC 2.1

      The problem faced by Labour Together was the consequence of becoming inoffensive to the established order so they could inherit power while the right wing was in disarray.

      This involved some betrayal of those they represented (fiscal discipline without new tax income to make progressive change at any speed unlikely).

      Then the right played the nationalist populism card (and now the first duty of a government to secure the realm by cutting welfare to spend more on defence) to undermine Labour in government.

      Will the Democrats learn, or will they try and marginalise progressives from their 2028 leadership and policy platform?

      https://bsky.app/profile/jaimeharrison.bsky.social/post/3moym65xe3c2w

  3. Bearded Git 3

    In the last 4 polls the Greens have averaged 12 and ACT have averaged 7.

    The trend is a disaster for Seymour. Watch him panic.

    In 14 out of the last 15 polls Labour has been ahead of National.

    Luxon is already panicking-see Micky's Kiwisaver post.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_New_Zealand_general_election

  4. joe90 4

    Tories, dopey pricks since 75…

    (@19 seconds)

    • mikesh 4.1

      The Cossacks, I think, were not Russian but Ukrainian. Latter-day Cossacks would probably have voted National.

      • SPC 4.1.1

        Cossacks were semi-military self-governing communities (of the Tsarist Russian era), exchanging military service for autonomy (as nobles did in feudal Europe).

        The Zaporozhian Cossacks originated in what is now Ukraine. The Don Cossacks, otherwise (and are associated with expansion into Siberia).

    • Graeme 4.2

      Back when National told us, just as we were sitting down to dinner, about a week before a very close election, that compulsory savings equated to communism. Well it was really the State owned and controlled investment vehicle that they were upset about, but the message was broad.

      It'd be another Aotearoa all together if this ad had never been broadcast and Labour had won the 1975 election.

      • Incognito 4.2.1

        I think there’s a vibe slowly emanating from National’s befuddled press releases and interviews, of being paternalistic and looking after families (with jobs & houses) because National knows what’s best for them. Daddy Luxon used the word “future” 21 times in his speech at the recent National Party AGM (https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2606/S00162/christopher-luxons-national-party-annual-conference-speech.htm). It’s National’s version of being the ‘nanny’ who will look after us long after the ‘nanny’ has gone after she got paid handsomely for her devious ACTs. The ‘nanny’ is, of course, strong on order & obedience because that’s what good parenting looks like. Ask Mummy Willis for money for ice cream and a movie and she’ll tell you that you must save your money for later because times are tough and it’s gonna rain tomorrow or the day after.

      • alwyn 4.2.2

        I really don't think, and I was around at the time, that the Cossack ad had that much influence on the final result of the 1975 election. It was seen as funny but I don't think anyone outside the Labour party took it seriously.

        The Labour Government were simply seen as not competent by the time the election came round. There handling of the oil shock was very poor indeed. In that regard the current Government should be congratulated on the way the current Oil shock has been handled

        • Belladonna 4.2.2.1

          I certainly wasn't paying attention to politics in 1975.

          But in retrospect, I think that the election result had more to do with the leadership of the Labour government. Moving from the high-profile and popular Norman Kirk, to Bill Rowling – who wasn't exactly noted for charisma. I think that many people felt that this was not the leadership/government that they'd voted for in 1972.

        • Incognito 4.2.2.2

          I really don't think, and I was around at the time, that the Cossack ad had that much influence on the final result of the 1975 election.

          Of course, you would say that. By many accounts, the ad was novel [at the time] and quite a success. Did it fundamentally change the election outcome? Who knows? Is it still actual and relevant? Yes!

          You, like so many others, particularly RWs and similar free-market ilk, pretend that voters are rational when selecting their votes, based on hard objective facts and critical reasoning only, etc. Have you heard of Trump, Hanson, and post-truth?

          • greywarshark 4.2.2.2.1

            Both hard-liner RW and LW think that their way is the correct and rational way, and so 'small' subterfuges are justified to make sure that the greater populace aren't swayed to the other side. So both are infected with 'hard objective facts' when necessary to gain or keep advantage; as Abraham Lincoln is supposed to have said –

            "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time." ― Abraham Lincoln"

            Did he get shot? You can't get people to be right-minded all the time – no sirree. 'And the Rest is Politics' – that is also the name of the podcast where you come close to hard objective facts, so go for it, it and notable others that commenters indicate, they are treasures.

          • Patricia Bremner 4.2.2.2.2

            Hanna-Barbera animation company did the adverts. for the National Party via Colenso. Muldoon had no delayed gratification, he wanted jam today.

        • Dennis Frank 4.2.2.3

          I was being trained (on the job) in making ads that year, when Rowling came to the big videotape machine I was operating & my boss introduced me to him.

          I shook his hand, as you do in such occasions, & returned to what I was doing. I'd already sussed him as incapable politically due to his media (lack of) presence.

          Muldoon being a shit alternative, I jumped ship a few months later. The ad was widely acclaimed as terrific propaganda. I was mildly amused but could tell it was likely to resonate with anyone who had noticed Labour's modus operandi. Yes, I probably processed the damn thing but if so, it was just another time-slot editing job.

  5. Subliminal 5

    It is to be hoped that the wins by candidates critical of the Israeli genocide of Palestinians in New York primaries is a permanent shift, even given the failure of Thomas Massie's reelection bid. Who would have ever thought that AIPAC support would be toxic?

    Accepting AIPAC funds has increasingly become a litmus test for US voters weighing a candidate's loyalty to the US over a foreign lobby.

    https://thecradle.co/articles/aipac-backed-candidates-lose-new-york-primaries-as-voters-reject-pro-genocide-lobby

    It is also to be hoped that the current NZ/AO govt sycophantic shielding of Israel from any meaningful criticism will be a cause of their continuing slide in popularity. It would be great if NZFs rise in the polls could be curtailed by Peters involvement in muting NZ/AO criticism. The following link is to an award winning NZ/AO documentary (Sitting On The Fence) on the large distance between our obligation, interests as a small trading nation, and our leaders public speech.

    https://www.sittingonthefence.tv/

  6. Incognito 6

    How ‘nice’ guys are being ‘nice’ to us, the people, about the negative consequences of their and therefore also our actions – we let them get away with it.

    https://theconversation.com/longtime-exxon-ceo-lee-raymonds-legacy-of-climate-denial-and-misinformation-lives-on-a-psychologist-offers-ways-to-counter-it-285667

    Some textbook examples include stories that incite fear and panic that reducing our reliance on oil and gas would lead to both widespread and permanent unemployment and demolish the economy.

    Hmmm, that sounds familiarly close to what the Coalition is trying to make use believe about the LNG facility – they would never, would they? At least we know what textbook the Coalition is using; it has greasy pages and an oily smell and should not be read by candlelight.

  7. Mercurio 7

    "…the Greens need to engage in more breaches of the Crimes Act 1961. Get out your wire cutters, Steve Abel, it’s time to rob a store. Set up a sophisticated scam, Lan Pham. Learn how to rob a bank or at least Larnach Castle, Fransisco Hernandez. There may be a short stopoff at Rimutaka on the way. But do this and the polls are clear about the end destination. You’re heading to Floor 9, The Beehive, corner of Molesworth Street and Lambton Quay, Wellington."

    The Spinoff notice what it takes for the Greens to flourish.

    https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/25-06-2026/the-greens-need-to-commit-more-crimes

  8. Anne 8

    Eat your heart out Barry Soper:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/dame-jacinda-ardern-receives-honorary-degree-from-oxford-university/I3UT5WDTINGCTBUE5IQDNHBSS4/

    The prick has devoted the past ten years trying to destroy Jacinda Ardern and has described her as an evil imposter – or worse. Nobody is going to bestow an honorary degree on him that is for sure.

    • Mercurio 8.1

      What's eating Barry?

      • Incognito 8.1.1

        Old age and the feeling of irrelevance.

      • AB 8.1.2

        Steve Braunias knows.

        To paraphrase Braunias (who, as a proper writer unlike Barry) knows it's better to leave it unsaid: lifelong stupidity.

      • Drowsy M. Kram 8.1.3

        Surely, [a PM's] significance should be equivalent to public service contribution to make all New Zealand a better, more prosperous, fairer place to live, work and, to use the term Barry hates, for New Zealanders to enjoy a sense of wellbeing that brings social and economic betterment, hope and happiness.

        https://newsroom.co.nz/2026/06/22/one-last-question-barry/

        Soper is old and shall grow older for a time, as we that are left and right grow old:
        Age shall weary Soper, and the years condemn.
        At the going down of the sun and in the morning
        I won't remember him.

        Legacy – Lange's, Clark's, and particularly young Ardern's – is what's eating Barry.

    • Incognito 8.2

      I have zero interest in Barry Soper and his book but I did happen to read this recent review of his memoir and it got panned.

      https://newsroom.co.nz/2026/06/22/one-last-question-barry/

    • alwyn 8.3

      I wonder if Jacinda is copying Herbert Hoover in his retirement?

      After the end of his disastrous single term as President he spent the rest of his very long life collecting honorary degrees. He ended up with 87 of them apparently. Ms Ardern will have a rather a busy time if she wants to emulate him.

      He was also nominated 5 times for the Nobel Peace Prize although, like Donald, he never got it.

      https://hooverpresidentialfoundation.org/herbert-hoover/

      • Incognito 8.3.1

        Oh, look, there’s a dead cat under the table playing with a dead mouse and it’s roaring its ugly head.

        • Drowsy M. Kram 8.3.1.1

          'The Cat Mouse That Roared' – great movie, imho. Very funny that Peter Sellers.

          Helen and her father will remain in Grand Fenwick, and so will the bomb: held by "the little countries of the world" as a weapon of last resort if the superpowers refuse to disarm.

          Checking the bomb for damage, Tully, Helen and Kokintz find it was "a dud" all along, and leave it in the dungeon, conspiring to keep its impotence secret. However, after they leave, a mouse emerges from it, and it appears to rearm, sitting ready to explode if disturbed.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mouse_That_Roared_(film)

      • Mercurio 8.3.2

        "The Wonders of alwyn", an obscure novelette published unnecessarily in the wake of Dame Jacinda Ardern's enormously successful, "A Different Kind of Power".

  9. Stephen D 9

    I CYMI
    From Nick’s Kōrero on Substack.

    ”Today’s edition is about two people and a petition. First, let’s meet Sarah, a reader of this newsletter who sent me a message last night:

    I would like to make you aware of a very important petition to assist disabled people. It is fighting for the right of a permanently disabled or chronically ill person not to lose all their government support if they have or get a working partner, or if their partner starts working. It would give them a guaranteed minimum personal income. I have written about it in the attached letter.
    It closes in 5 days, and I thought you might be prepared to share it if you agree it is important.
    Kind regards,
    Sarah.“

    https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/end-the-love-tax

    • tWig 9.1

      https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/health/620480/mother-fears-disability-support-services-bill-will-lead-to-desperate-caregivers-harming-children

      This RNZ story gets up close and personal in the huge human cost of being a family carer for a disabled person. It has become (predictably) much harder to get support under this government. The government also wants to neuter last year's ruling that family care givers are employees of the State, and to push responsibility for care completely onto the family.

      ‘Advocate Jane Carrigan, who has been supporting families caring for their disabled relatives for 14 years, said 90 percent had openly discussed suicide with her…One case that had stuck with her was that of a family who had taken in their sick sister, who had a disabled son. The sister confessed she'd had thoughts of killing herself and her son, but her family talked her down and promised they would look after him when she was gone.

      They told Carrigan later they wished they hadn't talked her out of it. "It was just horrible," Carrigan said. "It just made the hairs stand up on the back of my neck." '.

  10. Mike the Lefty 10

    National trumpetting about low cost loans for solar installations without council consent.

    Big deal.

    Some councils and banks do this already and Most solar installations don't need consent anyway.

    Another example of National taking someone else's ideas and claiming originality.

  11. Dennis Frank 12

    Market jitters have deflated the Musk bubble: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/24/elon-musk-trillionaire-spacex

    Elon Musk was no longer a trillionaire by the time markets closed on Wednesday. Plunging shares in Tesla and SpaceX dragged the tech magnate down to billionaire status. As of 4pm ET, Forbes listed Musk’s net worth as $970.2bn… A global stock selloff this week led to sharp declines for major tech stocks and dealt a blow to Musk’s wealth, however, as investor concerns that the Federal Reserve will potentially raise interest rates and looming fears of an AI bubble rattled the market.

    Musk is easily still the world’s richest person. The next wealthiest billionaire is the Google co-founder Larry Page, whose net worth is about $284bn, according to Forbes.Musk made more money than Page’s entire fortune this year alone, increasing his net worth by $338bn since January.

    Market froth sloshing back & forth is normal. Auto-trading with split-second timing done by fast machines drives the system nowadays. Whoever owns the best bot wins.

    Currently profit-takers are collectively deflating expectations of AI. When prices surge, everyone with spare cash gets into play to ride the gravy train. Musical chairs, as per birthday parties of 5-year olds. Slowest to react misses out on the mass sit-down. Then its back to reality for a while – the consolidation phase. Flow & ebb.

    If I were God, I'd tell the devil to stop fooling around. When people drove the market the animal spirits rationale made sense. No longer! God didn't make bots, so they must be work of the devil. God ought to tell the devil to do something useful for a change: get all that excess money flowing into improving social conditions.

    The devil will bleat that he has to use bureaucrats to do that and they always stuff up any system. Just an excuse. God ought to thump his desk, direct the devil to re-read Control Systems 1.01 and get it right this time!

  12. Drowsy M. Kram 13

    National’s Simeon Brown discourages members from strategic voting
    [RNZ, 21 June 2026]
    Labour leader Chris Hipkins said it was a coalition of chaos that had spent the past three years squabbling.

    He said New Zealanders were not going to find a strong and stable government in any of the three parties currently in charge.

    Strong and stable” – be careful now RNZ.

    Van Velden rebuffs NZ First's 11th-hour 'politicking' on health and safety overhaul [Be very careful now RNZ, 24 June 2026]
    Meanwhile, Peters has changed his tune twice in the past 24 hours on whether NZ First would vote in favour of it.

    He first said on Tuesday the party would have to support it due to the coalition agreement, though he promised to "fix it" after the election.

    Hours later, after a meeting with Pike River campaigners Anna Osborne and Sonya Rockhouse – who were in Wellington voicing their opposition to the legislation – he said he promised the pair he would not vote for it unless there were changes.

    But on Wednesday, addressing a crowd including Osborne and Rockhouse who had gathered to protest ahead of the bill's second reading in Parliament, Peters responded to chants of "kill the bill" that he "can't logistically do it now".

    Peters later told RNZ the coalition agreement contained "loose words" that it did not examine at the time, which he took responsibility for.

    One of Brooke van Velden’s final acts as a politician will also be her most dangerous [The Spinoff, 23 June 2026]
    But as with much Act policy it is evident, the moment one peers into the engine room, that this is an absolute trainwreck of a bill.

    The bigger picture here is that, even under the current laws, New Zealanders are six times more likely to die on the job than Brits, and nearly twice as likely as Aussies.

    Conscious of this truth, some National Party MPs have privately made it clear that they don’t really like the bill. But they aren’t prepared to oppose it. So it will be left to a party with more spine – and indeed more common sense – to overturn one of the worst pieces of legislation in recent memory.

    [comments]
    The average wage slave loses their dignity – being forced to live to a timetable – and their freedom. Are we now to accept that they may lose their limbs as well? … To say that the loss of a hand or a foot – or "even" a digit is non-critical is insane.

    >>>
    An incoherent, self-serving ghoul to the end.

    >>>
    Unfortunately, typical of this government. If it's not van Velden making workplaces less safe, it's Costello encouraging tobacco consumption, or a double whammy from Brown: making roads less safe through blanket no-evidence speed increases (and burying speed reductions in red tape) and ideological removal from health of people who don't share his distinctive world view. Oh for a prime minister with empathy, authority and competence.

    • greywarshark 13.1

      'Oh for a prime minister with empathy, authority and competence. '

      What is the value of democracy to us. The Prime Ministers and their underlings plus Finance Minister are just a replication of previous royalty, with good and bad kings and their good and bad advisors.

      The royalty-merchant class exchange of power has not led us to a good functioning society. It seems that ordinary people can't even trust themselves when given elevated positions, to behave with appropriate wisdom, restraint, and decision, and foresight. Too much to hope for?

      (Just think of the numerous squabbles and hates that can emerge when death of an elder with money is dealt with. n example of the frequently seen emotion of wanting and desires and personal gain that seems to swamp our behaviours too often personally and when we rise up the power and property and influence ladder.)

  13. greywarshark 14

    Just a thought about RNZ change of screen and accessibility at will. They have decided that their new format won't. Can't any entity stop this glamour-driven view of tech abilities to make their sites snap, crackle and pop like the old-time saying for breakfast dried rice. I can't enjoy RNZ news as I wish any time of the day and they have diminished its very good value as was by changing it round. I think all these tech people are descended from middle class architects, home furnishers and designers; always changing around, updating, revising, FGS leave our good things alone. Pink Floyd The Wall – We don't need no… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cR0d10DUj8

    • weka 14.1

      Just a thought about RNZ change of screen and accessibility at will. They have decided that their new format won't.

      what?

      • greywarshark 14.1.1

        Just a feeling and play on words – will/won't. It's a moan about not being able to access things as I will, but RN have changed the news page as I receive it on my computer and won't let me access it simply – I have to go through aural now it seems or something; there is a barrier before I can get it.

    • Belladonna 14.2

      It certainly appears that RNZ have updated their online offering.

      https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business_media/598571/check-out-the-changes-to-rnz-s-website

      I'm unsure what elements of this you find objectionable, and why.

      However, the above reference includes an audience feedback link – where you can tell them all about it, directly. Rather than hoping they read TS.

      • greywarshark 14.2.1

        Belladonna Why should I waste my time complaining? Don't you understand how things (don't) work these days. I haven't time to make requests or complaints or feedback, and maybe get instructions on how to do it now.

        There is no interest in listening and adapting to what people want which is just wallpaper – often they don't want the change anyway. It ain't broke, but the money is in changing and fixing it to suit someone else's pocket.

  14. Incognito 15

    Luxon said the goal was to "brutally commercialise our science system".

    "I want professors to become millionaires because they're partnering with entrepreneurs and building out businesses … where that interface between universities and entrepreneurship and government is all joined up, like we see in other parts of the world too."

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/politics/620498/luxon-constantly-underwhelmed-by-slow-ai-uptake-in-nz-businesses

    Here’s the lightbulb moment when & where it becomes crystal clear and blindingly obvious that Luxon has got no fucking idea what the hell he’s talking about. He sounds like a 3-yr old when asked what his favourite ice cream is (all of the ones he knows) or what he wants for his birthday (many bigly & shiny toys and the bigliest party ever). What a fucking moron!

    • KJT 15.1

      Real business people are, rightly, standing back and seeing if, despite the hype and bullshit, that AI is really going to add value.

      At present you need even more employees, to fact check AI.

      • Incognito 15.1.1

        The present value proposition of AI is quite different for small SMEs & self-employed compared to, say, larger corporates & government.

        I had a very major cringe moment (!) when I read Luxon’s choice of words ‘brutally commercialising our science system’ and the utter ignorance that was on display – a full frontal view of the emperor with no clothes.

    • Patricia Bremner 15.2

      Yes Incognito, he has no delayed gratification… 4 yr old!!!

    • Ad 15.3

      If he really wanted to commercialise New Zealand science he would not have killed off the Callaghan Institute which was set up to precisely do that, and not merged the CRI's, and not shunted thousands of our remaining scientists overseas.

      Agree he has no fucking idea what he is on about.

    • Mercurio 15.4

      "Luxon has got no fucking idea what the hell he’s talking about"

      QFT

  15. Ad 16

    Yo Forest & Bird team, good result. Especially when the Minister acknowledges you made him do it.

    Controversial clause in Conservation Amendment Bill that allows sale of conservation land to be removed | RNZ

    When a bill is so bad it united Forest & Bird with all the hunters, it's truly a dog.

    OMG we have a shot at kicking this lot out!

    • Bearded Git 16.1

      +100 Ad. Brilliant work Forest and Bird.

      But the Green Party fought this too, and is rightly still unhappy with the amended devious bill. They say it should be abandoned altogether:

      "This Bill still rewrites the purpose of the Conservation Act so commercial development comes first and nature comes second. Removing these clauses does not change what this reform was designed to do.You cannot fix a Bill written for developers by trimming the worst bits and hoping no one notices. The honest thing to do is stop, pull the whole Bill, and start again with a process that puts protecting nature for future generations at its heart."

      "Our public conservation land is not the Government's to sell, carve up, or quietly hand to commercial interests. The Green Party will keep fighting until this Bill is gone.."

      https://www.greens.org.nz/conservation_amendment_bill_needs_to_start_again

    • Patricia Bremner 16.2

      Yes Ad, may this be the first win of many. CoC out in 26!!

    • Hunter Thompson II 16.3

      See what the revised wording is – the CoC can't be trusted.

      The sale clause may be removed but they may leave another one allowing a 99 year lease of conservation land to private interests. That would still leave ordinary Kiwis locked out of public land.

      The Bill must be withdrawn because the conservation estate was not created to prop up the economy. (Jones clearly envisages putting wine bars in national parks and nature reserves),

      But withdrawal would involve a huge loss of face for Luxflakes and his mates.

      • Drowsy M. Kram 16.3.1

        An email from Greenpeace Aotearoa, earlier this evening.

        https://action.greenpeace.org.nz/petition/aotearoa-is-not-for-sale

        You might have heard about the Government’s outrageous plan to make it easier to exploit and even sell off public conservation land. Just a few hours ago the Minister for Conservation announced he wants to drop the clauses enabling the sale of conservation land. But…

        From start to finish this bill is rotten to its core and it must be scrapped entirely.
        Together we need to bury this Bill for good and show every single politician in this country that the people will not tolerate attacks on conservation land. Not now. Not ever.

        And let's be clear, today’s announcement has not actually changed the Bill. It cannot be changed by the Minister right now, because it is before the Select Committee.

        It is still vital that you make a submission against the Bill.

        Use our easy submission tool [submissions close 2 July 2026]:
        https://action.greenpeace.org.nz/ett/hands-off-conservation-land

        You can also head straight to the Government website. Fill in the contact details they ask for, and then clearly write: I oppose the Conservation Amendment Bill. It should be rejected in its entirety.

        • greywarshark 16.3.1.1

          DMK An accolade for the cartoonist – very very right and well done. Thanks for the insightful satire.

  16. Incognito 17

    Is the under-16 social media ban in Australia working? It may appear to be a failure, 6 months after coming into effect place, but it really is too early to tell and the full effects (desired and unanticipated) won’t be known for a decade, apparently – it aims at shifting norms & habits of future generations of children rather than making the current generation quit. Some interesting parallels with smoking are drawn.

    https://theconversation.com/85-of-kids-are-still-using-social-media-despite-ban-but-we-need-a-new-measure-to-judge-its-success-285946

  17. Incognito 19

    Good news and bad news!

    Good news for Pucky: lifting weights will help you live longer. Even better when doing moderate aerobic activity like walking, jogging, cycling, or swimming. Best when combining strength training with aerobic activity.

    More good news for Pucky:

    You don’t need a gym membership or a heavy barbell, either.

    https://theconversation.com/people-who-lift-weights-live-longer-new-study-284787

    • SPC 19.1

      It is better with

      1.some more intensive activity as well.

      I preferred the 100 metre sprint, 100 metre walk cycle for half an hour or so, to jogging for that reason. Fitter at the end of the 50s than the start.

      2.pilates and yoga (the gym had a combination class called body balance)

      • Incognito 19.1.1

        Sounds like HIIT or a variation thereof, which has many studied & reported health benefits.

        Strong core [muscles] and improved balance can help prevent many accidental falls among elderly.

        • greywarshark 19.1.1.1

          Too true – using core muscles protects back muscles being strained. I always carry my own groceries to car – can get heavy. If too heavy I split the load – nice to have staff offer help but important to keep body working as well as poss.

          l have bought books to keep informed on how to keep going. Should follow advice more but body is willing but mind doesn't settle. Reading about Michael Mosley is like doing a workout! Just reading how easy it is gives you a boost before you start. And Jon Gabriel is strong on the connection between mind and body – once you get eating right and your mind straight the excess goes and does not come back. (Michael Mosley had trouble with insomnia so may not have achieved that condition.)

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mosley#Career

          fast-exercises.com https://www.fast-exercises.com

          Fast Exercise » Welcome to HIT: fitter, stronger, better Can you really get the benefits of exercise in just a few minutes a week? Michael Mosley and Peta Bee explain Fast Exercise and its benefits.

          and –

          The Fast Diet https://thefastdiet.co.uk

          Welcome to 5:2 intermittent fasting » The Fast Diet Is it possible to eat well most of the time and get slimmer and healthier as you do it? Michael Mosley and Mimi Spencer show you how with the 5:2 diet.

          Jon Gabriel on making visualisation work for you, – mind-body approach. 12.20m https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGnwLc7Hf34

      • joe90 19.1.2

        A mate spotted my old man's disease and dragged me into a great family owned gym with a wonderful mix of people, kids, retirees, men, women, and everybody in between. A lifetime of manual work had pretty much jiggered my mobility so the first couple of years were tough but I persevered. I've since settled on zone 2 cardio on the bike, stretching /neck mobility drills/hip/glute /McGill big three, etc, and machines and kettle bells resistance work.

        More than a decade later and I'm as well as I was 30 years ago.

    • Mercurio 19.2

      "gumm(y)membership"

  18. Incognito 20

    The Lackland [Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas] outbreak [of the flu] is evidence that the underlying epidemiology has not changed – only the political climate surrounding public health.

    In other words, the influenza virus doesn’t give a shit about Pete Hegseth’s grandiose pontification about “medical autonomy and religious freedom” and the flu vaccine helps to protect against the virus. Duh!!

    When vaccination rates among Lackland recruits dropped from nearly 100% to 40% after the mandate was lifted, according to ABC News, the virus did exactly what respiratory viruses do in close quarters – it quickly spread.

    https://theconversation.com/the-military-traded-its-flu-vaccine-mandate-for-medical-freedom-an-outbreak-quickly-followed-286094

    In announcing the end of the flu mandate, Hegseth relied heavily on “medical freedom” language that emerged from the COVID-19 vaccine debate, rather than on any new evidence about influenza or the effectiveness of the flu vaccine.

    The medical freedom movement opposes government involvement in what its supporters see as personal health decisions – including public health recommendations such as vaccine mandates, masking and social distancing.

    What a bunch of idiots they are! No wonder that they created such a mess in Iran (and elsewhere).

  19. bwaghorn 21

    Drowsy , van veldrn lost here heart and sole to the job , so I guess finger is but a minor scratch to her.

Leave a Comment