The Standard

Open Mike 01/08/2026

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, August 1st, 2026 - 35 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

35 comments on “Open Mike 01/08/2026 ”

  1. Bearded Git 1

    Not a word about Winston's racism in the Herald headlines this morning.

    Well blow me down.

    • Dennis Frank 1.1

      Incognito accidentally alerted us to the reason yesterday: our privilege system, instituted in the colonial era to ensure that the elite are a class above us.

      Best not to publicise his racism lest voters realise he's using parliamentary privilege to do it. Sheeple may cotton on. Racism is legal in parliament, illegal outside. So either the law is an ass, or the double-standard is a damn good idea! Whaddaya reckon?

      • Bearded Git 1.1.1

        Well said Dennis.

        But the people need to be informed that NZF is led by racists. Shame on the Herald.

        • Mercurio 1.1.1.1

          Readers of the Herald must surely get news from other sources as well. Will there be many adults who haven't heard yet about Peters' racist baiting and slighting of our Chinese trade partners?

      • Incognito 1.1.2

        Incognito accidentally alerted us to the reason yesterday …

        Nope, it was deliberate, targeted, and pertinent, not accidental, and a direct reply to the gap in your knowledge.

        … our privilege system, instituted in the colonial era to ensure that the elite are a class above us.

        Nope, that’s utter nonsense (BTW, it also sounds as if you’re using ‘colonial’ as a pejorative).

        So either the law is an ass, or the double-standard is a damn good idea!

        Sigh

        Parliamentary privilege is designed to remove any impediments to the legislature going about its work, and to enable it to deal with challenges to its authority. Parliamentary privilege has been justified in law on the grounds that a legislature must be free from control by the Crown and the courts (an aspect of the constitutional separation of powers);[3] that it must possess certain powers to facilitate the carrying out of its functions; and that it, its members, and others participating in its proceedings must have certain immunities for the legislature to discharge its functions effectively.

        The privileges that a legislature benefits from are part of a constitutional expression of parliamentary autonomy and are a means to achieving an end—an effectively functioning legislature able to operate in the public interest. Parliamentary privilege may override other generally accepted legal rights in certain circumstances, which can at times lead to tensions. However, Parliament’s exception to the general application of the law has, over time, become a fundamental constitutional principle, which is itself part of the general law.[4]

        https://www3.parliament.nz/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/parliamentary-practice-in-new-zealand-2023-by-chapter/chapter-57-parliamentary-privilege/

        Parliament, or rather the Debating Chamber, is not a lawless pit. Geoffrey Palmer (‘Sir G’, as you like to call him) has written extensively about Parliamentary privilege, as you can imagine.

        https://lawnews.nz/treaty-maori/sir-geoffrey-calls-for-privilege-overhaul-amid-haka-row/

        He’s even written a whole book on it.

        Published ahead of the 2026 NZ General Election, this book by Sir Geoffrey Palmer invites public scrutiny of how Parliament wields its powers.

        Parliamentary privilege is ‘the oil of the democratic machine’. It can be defined as the special legal powers that allow Parliament to regulate its affairs – and is a curious mix of history, parliamentary practice, law and politics. ‘However, it is also viscous and volatile,’ writes Palmer, ‘and should not be left to sit too long without change.’

        https://teherengawakapress.co.nz/products/parliamentary-privilege-in-aotearoa-new-zealand

  2. Dennis Frank 2

    Whilst finding 18 breaches of te Tiriti is absolutely spiffing, it is merely a legal opinion.

    The Tribunal recommended the government "immediately pause its reforms" until meaningful co-design with Māori has taken place. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-ao-maori/854768/tribunal-finds-treaty-reforms-breach-te-tiriti-principles-prejudice-maori-damage-maori-crown-relationship

    Goldsmith may play his Maori card as an insider. A pause would be politic if meaningful co-design with Māori was a realistic possibility. Goldsmith may wonder what proportion of Maori are happy to finagle treaty rights in this manner, or he may not care, preferring to rearrange history as if it were a deck-chair display.

    Probably depends how anchored he is in his ethnic matrix, eh? Has anyone yet measured Maori collective opinion to discover the ratio of the main bodies of their public? Are fundamentalist treaty-clingons above 90%? Are those seeking to rewrite the law to put bounds on rights above 1%? Are those in between inclined to become progressive?

    If he doesn't have Potaka & other key conservative Maori on board, best to park the thing until after the election. He hasn't made a public case for reform that is compelling.

  3. SPC 3

    The record of the 2017-2023 government on child poverty.

    But that Government also showed that child poverty can be tackled if you have a Crown balance sheet strong enough to attack the issue – and the political courage to use it.

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/weve-forgotten-how-to-tackle-child-poverty-its-time-to-remember/premium/XRCMPMXDVZBYHEZENRBMSH4EPI/

    https://archive.li/gCkf3

    • The Chairman 3.1

      The Children's Commissioner recently wrote an open letter to all party leaders urging them to make ending child poverty a priority.

      https://www.manamokopuna.org.nz/publications/media-releases/open-letter-to-all-party-leaders/

      However, we need to do far better than that and change the focus to all poverty – not merely child poverty.

      For example, we have a growing elderly population and elderly poverty and financial hardship is also growing. And we should all know there is also great taxpayer cost associated to that failure. The longer we ignore it and only focus on child poverty, the worse it will get. So again, we need to focus on all poverty and we need to do it now.

      • greywarshark 3.1.1

        You are right TC, when we get to the stage that we have to tack child onto poverty before it even gets glanced at, that is a Bad Sign but so many of us don't take note.

        It shows that the government and their funders are trying to slip away from their proper tasks of, managing the economy and distribution of resulting revenue. They sneak off with goodies in their wallets that are needed for essentials by the common people. And some of us are more common than others, and some of us get a bit together and advance up the class ladder forgetting those still struggling behind reaching for a hand-up to help reach the first rung.

  4. Mercurio 4

    Weka wrote,

    "I don't know why Xu-Nan was asking Peters if he is vaccinated, but I can guess."

    31 July 2026 at 3:12 pm

    Me too. Xu-Nan will have known that Peters did choose to be vaccinated and that his pretence to the Anti-vax crown is hypocrisy writ large. He will also have known that Peters hates to be exposed as a hypocrite, and that Peters listens very closely to heckling when he's speaking in the House. He will have known also, that Peters frequently over-steps the mark with his acerbic responses. That's why, in my view, Xu-Nan asked his question. The result has been tremendously bad media coverage for Peters and a serious diminishment of respect for him amongst the other MPs of all parties.

    It hasn't fed a culture battle, it has exposed an on-going political behaviour of Peters; dishonesty. That's a sticky substance to be brushed with, imo.

    • Dennis Frank 4.1

      Ah, I did wonder about that. You make the point well. Press the right button in the psyche, the real person comes out. Greenie hit his mark accurately, so he deserves his list ranking! I presume privacy law protects Winston's hypocrisy; he has a private right to act contrary to his overt political alignment as per Machiavelli.

    • The Chairman 4.2

      Wasn't Peters calling for Hipkins etc to be charged (re covid failure) at the time of the interjection?

      As it seems to have drawn the main stream media attention away from that

      • Incognito 4.2.1

        Wasn’t Peters calling for Hipkins etc to be charged (re covid failure) at the time of the interjection?

        No – you cannot find the evidence for your nonsensical but rather bold suggestion in the Hansard. Not that you tried, evidently.

        As it seems to have drawn the main stream media attention away from that

        Because it lives rent-free only in your own lucid imagination.

      • Mercurio 4.2.2

        Peters is forever pointing his wrinkled finger at those he worked with in the past, blaming them for his own short-comings – the "main stream media" are fatigued by his caterwauling and don't rush to print every time he wheezes.

        • tc 4.2.2.1

          Peters performative display is quite intsructive, it's under parliamentary priviledge so he can't be held to account and in response to some standard NZF hyopcrasy being put on display.

          Heat needs to be applied by media and opposition in general to the destructive policies and culture wars being stoked whilst kiwi's struggle by the coalition.

          Winston has a ferry shaped albatross around his neck and should be held accountable for that. Bet he goes troppo if asked as he's one very precious polly when it's not going his way as we've seen through the term.

          • Mercurio 4.2.2.1.1

            Helen Clark says Peters lost his rag, well, she says,

            “I think the interjection struck a nerve and Winston spun out. He’s made a very serious mistake. I don’t think it was calculated.” Her advice to Peters was: “Offer the appropriate apology and move on”.

            "She doesn’t think Peters’ comments in the house were premeditated:".

            Xu-Nan got under his flabby skin and that's easy to do if you look foreign – Peters ain't takin' no lip from up-starts from over the sea!

            https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/01-08-2026/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-winston-peters-fine-political-minds-offer-luxon-advice

          • Incognito 4.2.2.1.2

            Winston has a ferry shaped albatross around his neck …

            A brave MP could ask Winston about the dead bird hanging around his neck, in plain English without accent, female voice, and ethnic or other baggage that might trigger the curmudgeon. Don’t expect a reasonable answer though.

            Conspiracists who played a prominent role in spreading misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic circulated false claims about H5N1, Hattotuwa [Dr Sanjana Hattotuwa, an expert on disinformation in NZ] says.

            “The language repeatedly casts bird flu as a sequel to Covid. ‘Covid 2.0’, ‘Con-vid 2.0’, ‘plandemic take 2’, ‘scamdemic 4’, ‘rinse and repeat’, ‘same old playbook’ and ‘dust off the same script’ place the new risk inside an already settled story,” he tells Newsroom.

            https://newsroom.co.nz/2026/07/29/new-conspiracy-theories-hatch-following-bird-flus-arrival-in-nz/

  5. Mercurio 5

    Wow!!!

    Ngai Tahu to "farm" Molesworth!

    ""For us, Rangitahi is not simply a farming opportunity. It is an ancestral landscape woven into the whakapapa of Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti Kurī, Ngāti Māmoe and Waitaha. To be entrusted with its stewardship is a responsibility we approach with humility and determination.""

    This'll have the Feds in a lather!

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/854409/ngai-tahu-farming-chosen-to-operate-country-s-largest-farm-molesworth-station

  6. Dennis Frank 6

    Younger generations seem keen to climb aboard the racism bandwagon: https://newsroom.co.nz/2026/08/01/geoffrey-palmer-be-careful-what-you-wish-for-new-zealand/

    New Zealand First’s youth party membership has shot up in the past 18 months. Young people, the party says, are turning to it because the major parties lack the courage to try something new.

    So common knowledge is spreading! Sir G seems freaked out: Winston is acting just like a Trump acolyte. Fences, obstacles and constraints apply…

    He has attempted to fence off the Congress, both the Senate and the House of Representatives… Trump treats the courts and the law as obstacles rather than as constraints he must respect

    Or disrespect. Optionality is the key here. Influencers get that gnosis. Sir G artfully pivots upon T's stance.

    The media, the judiciary, “elite” universities, and international experts are cast not as institutions doing an imperfect job but as adversaries working against ordinary people. This style of politics substitutes grievance for argument. It treats institutions built to check power, such as the courts, the press, the public service, as suspects rather than safeguards. Politics becomes personalised around a leader’s instincts rather than a party’s programme.

    Elegance of cultural analysis is commendable style, but let's focus on substance instead. Folks tend to grieve rather than argue – few are inherently disputatious. Grievance politics is therefore a consequence of human nature. When they notice the left & right colluding in their oppression, folks grieve more. Elefuckingmentary. If a hero emerges to represent their feelings via his instincts, they will naturally support him.

    Sir G just doesn't get it. Yet he does get part of the politics involved. The pale stale male role models personified by PM & Leader of the Opposition. Then he demonstrates classic Labour street cred by carefully avoiding the solution to the problem. The truth is out there, he signals, in the form of "a genuine answer". Who knows where it is?

    Young New Zealanders drawn to nationalist rhetoric because the major parties feel stale deserve a genuine answer to that complaint.

    • Incognito 6.1

      Sir G just doesn’t get it.

      It’s you who doesn’t get it – you were looking in the mirror and didn’t see or recognise your own reflection, which resembles a dreadful druid.

      As per usual, you turned [on a] a well written, considered, and constructive article into a negative diatribe about the author and his former party [Labour] and missing the author’s key point, of course.

    • greywarshark 6.2

      While keeping up with the USA debacle is important, for the sake of NZAO, time must be spent on looking at our own debacle, smaller but perfectly made! (Though note Toffler.)

      Quotes from thoughtful people: You've got to think about big things while you're doing small things, so that all the small things go in the right direction. Alvin Toffler

      And the air was full of Thoughts and Things to Say. But at times like these, only the Small Things are ever said. Big Things lurk unsaid inside. Arundhati Roy b,1961 Indian author – political activist https://www.azquotes.com/quotes/topics/small-things.html

      Alvin Toffler – Wikipedia Alvin Eugene Toffler[1] (October 4, 1928 – June 27, 2016) was an American writer, futurist, and businessman known for his works discussing modern technologies, including the digital revolution and the communication ,,,

      You can't achieve anything in life without a small amount of sacrifice. Shakira

      I am a person who has many dreams. But as soon as I accomplish one, I move on to the next. That's my fatal, absurd nature. Human beings are slaves to our dreams, and I am, too. Now I think I just want to share my musical proposal in its entire form. Shakira: Colombian songwriter b1977 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakira

  7. Dennis Frank 7

    AI is likely to defeat a powerful coalition of lawyers and bureaucrats, unless they mentally condition their stance via repetitive uttering of `jack be nimble, jack be quick". https://www.cfr.org/articles/cfr-surveyed-350-experts-about-ais-future-most-think-governance-is-failing

    CFR surveyed 350 foreign policy experts about what they expect the distribution of frontier AI capabilities and the nature of governance structures that emerge around them to look like by 2035. The experts disagreed on almost everything, but what they did agree on was alarming: no one is prepared to govern the AI capabilities that could be coming.

    Experts Agree That Governance Is Failing… full survey results on CFR.org. More than 80% of respondents expect that AI governance will be fragmented. Only 5% anticipate that domestic institutions, such as regulatory bodies and courts, will keep up with the pace of AI development… more than 70% say a serious AI accident is the most likely trigger for change.

    Top corporations have climbed the ladder of parity with state economies, so we are shifting to an era where state/corp hybid governance will happen:

    at the Group of 7 Summit in June 2026, world leaders were joined by the CEOs of OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, Mistral, and other companies to discuss AI governance, AI infrastructure, and international stability.

    • tWig 7.1

      Strange your summary doesn't mention the EU's ai regulation framework. They're about to start fining non-compliant firms.

      https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-starts-enforcing-ai-act-rules-and-new-transparency-requirements-2-august

      "Under the new rules, chatbots and other interactive AI systems will have to tell users they are dealing with AI, not a human. Deepfakes (images, videos, or audio that have been edited or generated using AI) will have to be labelled. AI-generated or altered content will also have to carry machine-readable marks so it can be detected more easily.

      The measures are intended to reduce deception and manipulation and help people make informed choices. They also give businesses clearer obligations and a practical way to show compliance. "

      It's certainly a good begining, dealing with the pointy part of ai: how firms use it on consumers.

      It’s not static legislation, either, but part of an improve-in-place initiative.

  8. Muttonbird 8

    Farrar is blubbing like a baby again, this time about his favourite target, Jacinda Ardern. NZ's chief Zionist is upset our former PM is able to work on speaking tours and able to pay the bills for her family.

    https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2026/08/aussie_taxpayers_making_jacinda_rich.html#comments

    Methinks the Zionist is jealous.

  9. joe90 9

    The old goat's morphing into tRump.

    https://x.com/winstonpeters/status/2083027510594544033

    A global far-right movement is finding recruits among disaffected young New Zealand men. Its activists are looking for a path into mainstream politics and believe generational change will carry them there. CHARLIE MITCHELL reports.

    https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/361051995/young-men-behind-new-zealands-new-far-right-movement (read only in chrome works for me)

    https://www.pressreader.com/new-zealand/the-press/20260801/281487873148739

    • Muttonbird 9.1

      On a trust scale for me Charlie Mitchell is in the 9/10 region but that's not the story. On a trust scale for me Winston Peters is a zero.

  10. joe90 10

    that's not the story

    I reckon it's a tale of two lobes, frontal and temporal.

  11. Muttonbird 11

    Some idiot here (it was Res Publica) asked recently and plaintively why Opportunity had gained momentum and visibility as if it wasn't stupidly obvious.

    The money has allowed them to make themselves relevant and big in media. This is why anyone is even slightly entertaining their ridiculous concepts. The money…

    [TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]

    [all you had to do in that comment was leave the name out. But you decided to personalise it, pejoratively, and not only provide no evidence but frame it in such a way as it’s hard for anyone to look up. In addition Res Publica is an author here. I take a very dim view of people that use this kind of commenting that undermines another commenter or an author. Take a week off – weka]

    • weka 11.1

      mod note.

    • Muttonbird 11.2

      Fair enough, but the point is it's not good enough for commenters, especially authors, to ignore basic analysis of a subject.

      In this case it was why TOP are approaching 5%.

      I can't find the post because the search function here is rubbish but Res Publica suggested it was because of policy and completely ignored the possibility it was because of marketing funding.

      Surely we can't be satisfied when senior members of this forum (your concept) don't do the homework?

  12. Joe90 12

    Stewart and Corey Doctrow and on Musk's SpaceX IPO scam.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OOLj4nl1FFs

    transcript

    Jon Stewart: So your argument is that this isn’t just another speculative bubble.

    You’re describing a financial time bomb that, if it played out the way you fear, could make the mortgage-backed securities crisis look small.

    Is that why all these billionaires seem so eager to get to Mars?

    https://www.facebook.com/nadines1/posts/an-excellent-explanation-of-how-billionaire-screw-over-working-people-even-when-/10174711688705305/

    AI and the Enshittification Era w/ Cory Doctorow | The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart

    • tWig 12.1

      This discussion is fantastic, will be sharing it widely, thanks Joe90. I already knew about the dodgy Spacex IPO strategy forcing indexed retirement funds to carry the loss, while the big players offload their stock.

      Plundering pension funds is last-stage piracy by the rich of the rest of society.

      As for Jon and Cory's lightening to-and-fro, with an exposé per minute, is the very best example of true conversation…

      PS. Turns out I somwhow watched the whole conversation, not just the short. Find it on youtube, it’s amazing at Jon’s site.

  13. tWig 13

    DoubleDown News background the recently dead Lindsey Graham, who, Trump eulogised "Never met a war he didn't like".

    Graham was a US Army lawyer, involved in Iraq and Afghanistan. DDN claim his role was to enable US war crimes to be hidden, such as at the notorious Abu Graibh detention centre. DDN also expose his desire for the complete distruction of Palestine.

    Watch to learn just what a nasty person he was (it's not long).

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-oM8Z62BFBA

Leave a Comment