Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, May 17th, 2026 - 26 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:

Open mike is your post.
For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Step up to the mike …
Many in the USA are having doubts about permitting power hungry and noisy data centres.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/16/texas-county-data-center-construction-ban-00922493
"The growth [of data centres] has stirred pushback from environmentalists and rural residents who worry about the effects on water supplies, the electric grid and their quality of life…..opposition to data centers appears to be hardening, and politicians are paying attention. A Gallup poll conducted in March showed 71 percent of respondents said they wouldn’t want to live near data centers, with 48 percent strongly opposed."
Of course Trump is a major supporter of data centres, which is as good a reason as any to opposed them.
"President Donald Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) have both made artificial intelligence — which relies on power hungry-data centers — an economic priority."
The UK is about to introduce legislation to ban all new North Sea oil and gas licenses. The UK is able to do this because of massive solar and wind installations already developed.
The COC dinosaurs have moved in the opposite direction of course.
https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/uk-moves-ban-new-north-sea-oil-gas-licenses-permanently
As an election issue here the UK's (and Australia's similar) stance is a godsend to Labour/Greens.
Luxon is on the wrong side of history as ever. Just as he is with Te Tiriti, NCEA, RONS, Climate Change measures etc etc etc
Not just the UK, most nations planning similar initiatives 'inspired' by Trump ironically.
https://www.salon.com/2026/05/16/green-energy-will-have-the-last-laugh-because-of-trump/
If I have had my access allowed.
Did you read the article you linked to where it says
"Oil and gas still accounts for three-quarters of the UK’s energy mix. And the majority of those fossil fuels are now shipped in from abroad, meaning other economies benefit from the job creation and tax receipts that are derived from the lucrative drilling and refining processes."?
If that statement is true how can you possibly claim that " The UK is able to do this because of massive solar and wind installations already developed.". They cannot possibly replace oil and gas usage, surely and if they are still going to have to use fossil fuels is it not best to control their production rather than have to depend on countries like Russia?
edit. I see I have been released from durance vile. Thank you.
Alwyn-I used a link from Zerohedge which you will be aware is a website well to the Right. It always attacks any measure that is designed to aleviate Climate Change.
In 2025 renewables generated a record 52.5% of the UK's electricity and this is going up all the time.
https://www.renewableuk.com/news-and-resources/press-releases/record-breaking-stats-show-renewables-generated-over-half-uk-s-electricity-for-the-second-year-running/
But the point of the post was to show that the fifth biggest economy in the world has decided to move away from fossil fuels in the future. It currently has another 130 GW of renewables (280 Clyde dams worth) in various stages of development.
This analysis of the UK situation captures key features well:
Dunno about that last bit – any omnipotence of regulators strikes me as more like hallucination than reality. It's good that they are thinking more deeply though.
As addendum to that, the analyst detects subterranean forces at work:
Nothing the overclass did has worked, so folks must abandon support for the establishment. They no longer do the compulsive fore-lock tugging that persisted through the 19th century but they still do the inner cringe in subservience despite being increasingly baffled about who they are supposed to cringe to…
Dirty Dairy and Nitrates…Collusion, and being enabled/protected by Environment Southland ?! At my local Library I read the ODT Sat 16th and was very taken aback to read a seemingly active
smokeshitscreen was being applied by this organisation.The ODT Link is subscriber...but its all there…
This was earlier from Greenpeace’s Will Appelbe (who I respect)
RNZ article covered earlier too….
“New report exposes potential nitrate pollution in Southland”
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/587940/new-report-exposes-potential-nitrate-pollution-in-southland
Well spotted, PLA.
The state of NZ's water resources is covered in the Ministry for Environment report: https://environment.govt.nz/publications/our-freshwater-2026/#2-freshwater-quality
I also recommend Mike Joy's book, The Fight for Freshwater.
HT II Cheers for that. As I say I was taken aback at the collusion of Environment Southland, in what is an actual Health danger….and for what, some dirty dairy farmers? Reeks.
Re Prof Mike Joy. Been a long time brave fighter…for NZ's Environment !
Strike ! Humans fight back against AI Oligarch$. (and yes, I do realise its still about employee money…but, a fightback nonetheless)
The Yank-Nigerian axis is working well:
Very statesman-like of him eh? Yet I sometimes get the impression T likes the old cowboy riding off firing madly in all directions thing.
Well, it's good to know that the Nigerian Army is on X. Informs the global media elite that missionaries in darkest Africa may no longer fear the cooking pot. Puts Musk on notice that his African roots are reaching out to him. Makes multi-racial geopolitics look like a global trend. I presume those yank soldiers are called Africommandos?
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-isis-second-command-abu-bilal-al-minuki-eliminated-2026-05-16/
Constipation situation: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/5/16/iran-war-live-lebanon-israel-extend-truce-tehran-ready-for-more-us-talks
They just need a drone with swipe-card facility attached. Send it to each ship so the captain can pay the user-fee. Simple, just like any other parking lot, toll-booth, or online payment scheme. Iranian state website with a shia funding module included gives them optionality for foreigners wishing to pay for the will of Allah.
In a state of freedom, nobody owns you. Aotearoa has long seemed close to this ideal, but Dame Anne has questions around that: https://newsroom.co.nz/2026/05/16/anne-salmond-democracy-for-sale/
Seems like she hasn't realised that state-owned enterprise law means the answer she is seeking is the state. Notice that she believes it is either citizens or politicians. Such muddled thinking is typical of people who are produced by the education system.
Nonetheless she is trying to provide a positive alternative, which is a Good Thing, so I must try not to be too accurate in my critique.
I get her point: if we switch to communism, we'll rocket up to the top of the global wealth parade, standard of living, etc. If it worked for the Swiss, it can work for us!! Unfortunately, she fails to jump to this obvious conclusion.
Time will tell. The minute I see anyone in Labour do what she's telling them, I'll report it here with considerable enthusiasm. I see only a single problem with this political strategy; the in-pulling of heads was popular in the 1960s but not since, so behavioural contagion is unlikely, especially in younger generations who will probably only be able to learn the technique via proper therapeutic advice. Who will pay?
Pull your head in.
I think Dame Anne deserves a better analysis than that DF. Thanks for all the other work you have put in today though. Interesting and I know takes time, I'm enjoying reading your findings.
I find her writing very hard to follow.. it's so vague as if we're all supposed to know who are "the foreign interests", who's the "libertarian afraid of free speech" and "we need to vote out politicians who do ABC and vote in politicians who do XYZ" FFS can't she just say "NZF & NATS & ACT baddies vote for Lab & Greens goodies"??
I think she might want people to think around their firm premises? Being definite about everything every election hasn't been sufficient to advance in NZ a decent phalanx of reps to take on the world. More like having taken a butlering course on how to politely usher in an invading horde of heads stuffed with money tricks mostly. Welcome to the circus, the legerdemain is fine.
Talbot Mills Poll here….it 's tight:
Lab 36 Gre 9 TPM 2=47
Nat 29 NZF 14 ACT 7=50
While this shows the Right ahead by 3, they were up by 7 in the last Talbot Mills (52-45). ACT and National remain in the doldrums. Hipkins is preferred PM.
I remain convinced there will be a TPM overhang that will help the Left.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/new-poll-keeps-national-in-the-20s-labour-retains-biggest-share-of-support/ECSCZV3ZQZETTDDOIRAEEW476A/
Labour will sweep the Maori seats… or maybe Huhana will win TTT if TPM don't choose Hone. I'm praying Tania beats Rawiri. Debbie also not a shoo in… and down Te Tai Tonga..?? Who knows? Takuta been quiet on the late night bong rants lately
Yet another US illegal act coming soon ? As they seek to assert domination over the very small thorn in their side…
Found this while looking for examples of people calling political opponents fascist.
Charles McBryde on when and when not to call someone a fascist (4 mins)
https://www.tiktok.com/@charlesmcbryde/video/7594618347229121806
"NZ First to oppose privatisation".
Also NZ First: "We rule out working with Labour, Greens and Te Pati Maori".
Leaving it able to only work with pro-privatisation parties National and ACT.
"NZ First opposes Regulatory Standards Bill, will work to repeal".
Also NZ First: "[Costello] said the bill fundamentally promoted accountable and open government and promoted the rule of law, efficiency in regulation, property rights, an independent judiciary, and equality before the law."
They oppose a bill the day after it passes with their votes!
NZ First: We say whatever we want, to whoever we want, then do whatever we want. Don’t worry about cognitive dissonance, thinking is for pointy-heads.
Feel free to add more examples, for e.g.
please provide a link for the quotes (it's a requirement of commenting here)
Sharon Murdoch does it again – this is funny, and I'm still trying to figure out why.
https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361005674/cartoon-may-17
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/mcanulty-vs-bishop-d45
Deputy PM and ACT leader David Seymour might be onto a winner here – it's worked for former deputy PM Peters, and now the CoC CEO has tacked onto a more cautious track.