The Standard

Open Mike 02/06/2026

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, June 2nd, 2026 - 48 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

48 comments on “Open Mike 02/06/2026 ”

  1. Drowsy M. Kram 1

    Do Kiwis really need to know what scientists really think? Be careful now RNZ.

    What scientists really think of this year's Budget [RNZ, 30 May 2026]

    "Let's not forget that New Zealand has historically underinvested in research and development compared with many OECD countries, sitting at around 1.5 percent of GDP compared with an OECD average closer to 3 percent."
    [ – New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society president Joanne Clapcott]

    Kyle Higham from Motu Economic and Public Policy Research said the Budget asked scientists to do more with less, then wondered "why they leave".

    "In short, it appears the powers that be already know where the breakthroughs will come from, and we just need to have some faith in their instincts," Higham said.

    [Director of the MacDiarmid Institute Nicola] Gaston said there was nothing to celebrate in Budget 2026 for research and science.

    She said the government had ignored advice from the Science System Advisory Group to increase funding for the sector's major reforms.

    "It should have simply postponed the scale of change originally proposed, because it was never willing to pay for the cost of those changes.

    "To mix my metaphors: we have been left with a dog's breakfast, in need of euthanasia."

  2. PsyclingLeft.Always 2

    Meta/Facebook and bullies ? Meta/Facebook are bullies…..

    Lid-lifting Kiwi author forced to sit in silence at writers' festival

    She wasn't allowed to nod or shake her head during the session, held in front of a full audience. Copies of Wynn-Williams' book, Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed and Lost Idealism, were pulled from the bookshop.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/life/books/lid-lifting-kiwi-author-forced-to-sit-in-silence-at-writers-festival

    An earlier attempt by Kiwi Sarah Wynn-Williams to talk on RNZ..was also blocked by them. Great reach and power of the Oligarch Techbro fascists.

    Lid-lifting Kiwi gagged over Facebook book

    "Amazing. Of all the books in the world Mr. 'Free Speech' Zuckerberg wants to ban, it's the one about him," said The Guardian critic Marina Hyde.

    "I thought he was done with fact checking," she added.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/545714/lid-lifting-kiwi-gagged-over-facebook-book

    FYI...I am not, nor ever have, fallen for Facebook, or indeed been a member of same. Saw through them decades back…..

    • tc 2.1

      Behold the power of the Zuck. Designed an app that people could use on Myspace (remember that kids ) that effectively took the data over to their FB account back in the early days.

      Not so long ago someone created an app on Instagram that stripped out all the algorithm crap for just your contacts and other personally relevant links.

      He had it taken off google play and Apple istore as when Zuck does it it's innovation, if someone does it to him it's got to be stopped.

  3. SPC 3

    If one wants to be a NZF MP the fast track is having Maori ancestry and supporting Hobson's Pledge (led by Don "Orewa Speech" Brash).

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360986875/new-conservatives-elliot-ikilei-stand-nz-first-years-election

    Is being social conservative conditional on being a foot soldier for the northern hemisphere’s colonial establishment?

    • SPC 3.1

      Tau Henare once a NZF Party Maori electorate MP and waka jumper Mauri Pacific leader in the Shipley regime ended up standing for National on the 2005 party list (Don Brash was leader at the time).

  4. PsyclingLeft.Always 4

    Wtaf.That would buy a lot of Books?! And pay Librarians…: (

    'Atrocious': Wellington's deputy mayor slams $600,000 bill for library website

    The contract went to Journey Digital, an Auckland-based agency.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/596986/atrocious-wellington-s-deputy-mayor-slams-600-000-bill-for-library-website

    • Psycho Milt 4.1

      This is what happens with managerialism. 20 years ago, the council would have had some IT people who'd put together some web pages for the library based on what library staff said they needed. Now, there must be a strategic assessment, a business case for change, a robust procurement process including a full RFP with the exact requirements listed out and IT security checks, referee checks etc on all the proposals, project management, staff consultations, customer consultations, progress reporting etc. Little of the $600,000 will actually have been spent on creating a web site.

    • Bearded Git 4.2

      This is a private company ripping off the ratepayer.

      I'd like to know who owns it and who works there.

      • gsays 4.2.1

        I don't know about ripping off, I think PM is right. 40 years of gutting public capacity (unable to develop and administer a website!) has led to a bunch of 'procedures and protocols'.

        That doesn't mean there isn't some fat on the invoice…

        Any tories or neo liberal acolytes can't have an opinion on this as this is the 'efficiency' of a market solution.

    • AB 4.3

      I'd want to know what this 'website' is doing before passing judgment. Is it just an informational website or an actual library system, i.e.

      • Is it handling library membership such as expiries, reminders, issuing cards, issuing fines, processing online payments and keeping personal information secure?
      • is it doing collection management, i.e. what items are in the physical collections, what was on order, what did it cost, where was it ordered from, plus the same for online magazine/journal subscriptions
      • is it managing borrowing – what is out on loan, when and to whom and what is overdue?
      • is it keeping usage data on every item in the collection in order to optimise collection management such as which subscriptions might be cancelled etc?
      • does it keep and manage a log of enquiries received and answered by the Reference Librarians at the desk to drive service improvement ideas?
      • does it have to disaggregate this data to support functions within any branch libraries?
      • does it produce a useful collection of visual reports to assist library management on all of the above five functions?
      • what third party software is licenced to support all this and what are the licence costs?

      Then there are ongoing operational costs:

      • who is responsible for ongoing bug fixes and enhancements and what does that cost?
      • where is it hosted and if cloud-hosted commercially what is the cost?
      • how are new software releases handled, who tests them and who does the rollout and is this done in a separate test envirionment with additional hosting costs?

      And probably heaps of other things I've forgotten.

      The point is that library systems have lots of use cases and as public-facing systems they need to be thoroughly tested and have minimal downtime to avoid reputational damage. So, it seems possible to me that the word 'website' is doing a ton of heavy lifting here. So call me a bit skeptical when some amateurish sounding dude claims he could've done it overnight in his home office. I may be quite wrong and this might really be just some trivial little website off to the side of the main event, but there are some warning signs here.

      • PsyclingLeft.Always 4.3.1

        I'd want to know what this 'website' is doing before passing judgment. Is it just an informational website or an actual library system, i.e.

        Well you sure have put a major effort into your defence comment ?…But it does seem that it is…maybe just a promotional !

        I dont have a Post subscription…however more might be revealed in Link below….(FYI there was more on the net…but Facebook et al)…

        Wellington Library’s $14k website bill was actually closer to $600k

        https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361012284/wellington-librarys-14k-website-bill-was-actually-closer-600k

        Anyway…my comment, still stands as to buying a lot of Books…and paying for Librarians.

        • AB 4.3.1.1

          Not a defence PLA at all – just a cautionary note about jumping to conclusions.

          And it didn't take a major effort at all. I know enough about libraries and software development for that list to just drop out in about 10 seconds. And I also know how many people consistently belittle libraries and librarians and wrongly assume the whole thing is dead easy and simple – so my antennae do go up if I suspect that might be happening.
          And if it really is just a simple website with some promotional content, then questions need to be asked about the quality of project management.

          • PsyclingLeft.Always 4.3.1.1.1

            just a cautionary note about jumping to conclusions.

            Yea…I dont think I have done that here…ever?

            And ok….I see where you are now. Fine.

            I know enough about libraries and software development for that list to just drop out in about 10 seconds.

            And re…

            And I also know how many people consistently belittle libraries and librarians

            How/do, you think I did that ? Especially regarding my own comment ?

            You are obviously close to this area…maybe take your own advice?

  5. Mercurio 5

    Day One, Christopher, Day One!

    "That's why this Budget is extending post natal stays to three days for all Kiwi mums.

    "Fixing the basics, building the future and backing families from day one."

    In steps Mr Can't Recall:

    "mistake happened, we've corrected it".

    Come on NZ – at the coming election we can all say,

    "mistake happened, we've corrected it".

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/597006/post-natal-stay-announcement-incorrectly-characterised-christopher-luxon-says

    • Bearded Git 5.1

      After a normal birth the mother actually only needs 1 or 2 days in hospital, not 3.

      • weka 5.1.1

        depends on the mother and her situation

        • gsays 5.1.1.1

          Yep.

          I heard of a heartbreaking situation a month or two ago. Mum was homeless, drug and alcohol issues and a physically abusive partner. A week would have been good to try and get support and baby a better start in life.

      • Wynston Cooper 5.1.2

        Interestingly, depending on the hospital where the woman was, in 1973 it was up to 14 days, and in 1976 it was up to seven. By 2003 it was mostly three. Are they being bred tougher these days, or is just to keep the cost down?

        • Mercurio 5.1.2.1

          Ask any man: he'll explain.

        • I Feel Love 5.1.2.2

          In 1980 my mum spent a week when my youngest brother was born (I remember), & when my own child was born my kids (amazing) mum spent maybe 8 hours at the hospital (to be fair the birth was at midnight & it went really well & it turned out my kids (amazing) mum spent the day at home in labour before we hit the hospital, by the time the mid wife et al were scrubbing up the baby shot out like a slippery eel).

  6. Drowsy M. Kram 6

    Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed.” – Einstein

    Could the assorted pillars of Kiwi society leading and funding the NActF coalition of corrupt charlatans please put their greed on hold for just a minute. 'Make us!'

    3 [of 3]. NZ Asset Sales – 2025 – The Garage Sale Nobody Asked For
    [John Luxton, 13 Nov 2025]

    Exactly how stupid do they think we are?

    The official term is “asset recycling”. The unofficial translation is “we’re selling more of your stuff”.

    The new government insists it is all very sensible. Christopher Luxon talks about “managing the balance sheet”. David Seymour wants a “mature conversation” about what the Crown should still own.

    In other words, we already tried to sell our way out of debt. We ended up with the debt and no assets.

    The deeper insult in 2025 is psychological. Having lived through the original heist and the long silence, we are now being invited to smile our way through the encore. We are expected to forget that Treasury’s own leaked documents describe the 1984 – 99 reforms as the biggest wealth transfer in Crown history and to trust the same institution when it whispers that maybe Kiwibank and KiwiRail no longer “justify” their presence on the balance sheet.

    You can see why ordinary people feel like they are in a rigged game. They pay Sydney-owned bank fees, Australian-owned power prices, rent to foreign landlords and are now being told that selling the few remaining public levers will somehow make things better.

    This is not a neutral policy debate. It is a choice about who we think this country is for.

    Forty years ago we let ourselves be talked into a grand experiment. We were told there was no alternative. We know now there was. The question in 2025 is brutally simple.

    Do we really want to be the only country that looked at the wreckage of its last privatisation binge and said, “Great, let’s do another round – this time with feeling”?

    A(t)las, Fair Lotto lady Nicky-No-Boats' socioeconomic credibility has taken another hit with 'Tough Love' Budget 2026, while assorted wreckers continue to busy themselves in "Selling off our country for parts…" Rapacious private capital needs new investment opportunities, and the NActF CoCC is only too happy to oblige – "Thank you very much for your kind donation, thank you very much, thank you very very very much."

    Why is Kainga Ora selling state houses to property developers instead of families [22 March 2026]

    Kāinga Ora review must not usher in new era of privatisation by stealth [Child Poverty Action Group, 20 May 2024]
    The Luxon-led government has said it won’t sell off state houses. However the Bill English report makes recommendations to create community housing associations, which Public Housing Futures and Child Poverty Action Group warn could see the state withdraw from building the public homes we need.

    • SPC 6.1

      They could have sold the state houses, via rent to buy or equity share, but they chose not to.

      On 1/4 acre sections they could place a granny flat on a back section and reduced the cost of a family sized home (or done the same for a KO property for multi-generational families).

      They prioritised urban density and private profit to the wealthy.

      Class based decision-making.

      They may not be selling off the entirety of the stock but they are blocking the path towards more state owned housing – despite the growing demand (those retiring without home ownership). And they are increasing rents to 30% of income (from 25%) – a first step towards a return to their 1990's policy – market rents?

      • Drowsy M. Kram 6.1.1

        yes

      • tc 6.1.2

        Like last time in keys govt when police, DOC etc all sold off some housing I'd really like to know who gets to purchase those juicy 1/4 acre bocks in 'nicer' suburbs.

        A full list across the 12 years of NACT would be very interesting IMO.

        My local police have to seek rental properties in summer for the extra officers required as they sold the local housing they owned.

    • Bearded Git 6.2

      Those numbers are terrible. I didn't know they had put 900 up for sale as well.

      They really are bastards.

  7. greywarshark 7

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/596996/heartland-bank-planning-to-buy-tsb-for-620-million-in-merger

    (Why TSB which I thought was almost the last NZ owned bank?)

    …"As the NZX/ASX-listed parent company of a larger, more efficient New Zealand banking business, Heartland will be able to deploy capital more effectively across the group, and have the scale needed to deliver a stronger cost-to-income ratio through greater operating leverage."…

    The aggregate consideration to Toi Foundation of $620m represented 76 percent of TSB's book value and would be comprised of ordinary equity in Heartland, resulting in a 17.5 percent shareholding in Heartland by Toi Foundation…

    https://www.heartland.co.nz/about-us/history-of-heartland-bank

    Over the decades, we’ve evolved through a series of strategic mergers – first joining forces with SMC Building Society and Loan & Building Society to become CBS Canterbury in 2008. In 2011, CBS Canterbury merged with Pyne Gould Corporation’s Marac Finance, Southern Cross Building Society, and PGG Wrightson Finance to create what is known today as Heartland Bank.

    …In 2024, Heartland Bank became the first New Zealand registered bank to acquire an Australian bank, Heartland Bank Australia – demonstrating Heartland Bank’s continued strength, resilience and ambition to do things differently.

    • Bearded Git 7.1

      The new Heartland/TSB bank will have assets of roughly $17 billion which is peanuts.

      This is a non-story. The MSM is spinning this like it will improve competition in the sector-dream on.

      The four Australian owned banks have assets of roughly $630 billion between them.

      (Kiwi Bank has assets of $43 billion.)

      • Drowsy M. Kram 7.1.1

        It may be a non-story vis-à-vis 'improved competition', but I use TSB for day-to-day banking so it's of interest to me.

        Our twerking arrogant prick of a DPM use it to bloviate about politicians' bloviations.

        https://www.facebook.com/davidseymourACT/posts/tsb-and-heartland-banks-merger-creating-a-new-zealand-challenger-bank-of-scale-w/1521534169343856
        [only for those who can stomach him]

        One thought: Could this merger mean Kiwis who have a term deposit of $50k – $100k with each bank mean that they will no longer be fully covered by the DCS?

        The DCS covers you up to $100,000 if your deposit taker fails, when your money is held in DCS-protected accounts.  The DCS came into place on 1 July 2025.

        https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/dcs

      • greywarshark 7.1.2

        I think the Australian connection is of interest in the Heartland deal and the fact that were unwilling to trot along being a good NZ lesser business.

        Small is Beautiful by EF Schumacher fits right in here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful

        Interesting also is to find the supermarket breakfast food shelves flooded by Hubbard produce which is now owned by the Hart Family, Oz-centred, Dick having got out in 2018 I think. I want NZ to make stuff and be able to provide for ourselves, not have to wait at the ports like cargo-cult people, for food and services to arrive from the overseas Gods. Or even to have to queue for the local allocation at premises from which we could be excluded, as is the case with some supermarkets already. Think wider peeps. There is a trend here which is troubling.

    • Wynston Cooper 7.2

      SBS Bank and the Cooperative bank are still NZ owned.

  8. SPC 8

    Data centres across the USA.

  9. Drowsy M. Kram 9

    Finance minister ‘regrets’ saying New Zealanders living in social housing have ‘won the Lotto [Stuff, 21 May 2026]
    I reached for the wrong metaphor when trying to make a point about fairness in the housing system." [ – Finance Minister and Lotto Lady Willis]

    [comments]
    She hates poor people.

    >>>
    Making social housing tenants pay more so they can increase the accommodation supplement which gets funneled straight into the pockets of private landlords. Can’t make this sh*t up.

    More punching down on the vulnerable by morally-bankrupt ghouls.

    Vote for change.

    The truth is, in a rare moment of candour, 'fair' Lady Willis reached for a metaphor from the heart. "The wrong metaphor" is simply the best 'regret' another one of the National’s 'big brains' could come up with after the mask slipped.

    https://vote.nz/

    Hey, youse lucky Lotto winners in social housing, what I would say to you is our donors want a piece of those winnings. Just relax, it's all taken care of – we won't feel a thing.

    Move-On!

    Every expert said don't do 'move on' orders. The Govt did it anyway.
    [The Kākā (paid), 2 June 2026]
    Police, MSD, OT, Corrections, Justice & Treasury all said 'move on' orders were impractical, dangerous, expensive and breached homeless peoples' human rights. Yet Paul Goldsmith did it anyway

  10. Ad 10

    Regrettable that Willis's former company really is fully running around the PM's office and making sure the hits go hard against any resistance to total dairy control of our land:

    Fonterra legal case doc sent to private email of Luxon's former staffer

  11. Mercurio 11

    This. This. This.

    "The Government is removing voting rights for non-elected representatives on councils following questions raised over iwi representatives on the Far North district council."

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360987003/government-remove-voting-rights-iwi-representatives-council

    This.

    • Graeme 11.1

      I get a feeling that there's a spectacular own goal coming with this one. Not all appointments to Council committees are māori.

      • Mercurio 11.1.1

        Tell us more!

        • Graeme 11.1.1.1

          Most audit a risk committees have an independent chair, usually with voting rights, and often appointed members as well. Other council committees often bring in outside members for appropriate expertise. Iwi representatives on committees just follow the same structure.

          These outside members are vital for keeping councillors and staff focused and pulling up any dubious decisions. They are there for a reason, take them away and it's only a matter of time before something goes pear shaped, probably quite spectacularly.

  12. bwaghorn 12

    I agree with the cocs on this , I'm OK with with Maori wards but those on it must elected in open elections , possibly using the Maori roll

    • Mercurio 12.1

      Why?

      Iwi select their representatives by their own, time-tested/Aunty-tested processes.

      Pakeha elect theirs through easily-manipulated, subject to corruption processes: (see Seymour's path to Government).

      Why should some wide-boy, ACT/Atlas-backed, Jonny-come-lately twerp be granted voting power and an iwi-backed representative be "allowed" none?

      Really interested in your view, bwaghorn 🙂

  13. bwaghorn 13

    Unfortunately I have first hand experience of a iwi leader who's dishonest, I hope he never gets put up for a ward spot.

    Unfortunately seymour was elected, but democracy is always the right way.

    • Mercurio 13.1

      "Unfortunately seymour was elected, but democracy is always the right way."

      Democracy was perverted to get seymour elected – democracy has its flaws, yes?

      It's not "always the right way" – it has to be tempered by other inputs and Te Ao Māori is willing and able to provide those but if we reject their offer because we know of one who's dishonest, we are shooting ourselves in the foot.

  14. greywarshark 14

    I thought we had been 'operating' under democracy all my life, and it turns out to be a poisoned chalice. How can people make such a statement, 'but democracy is always the right way'? That is a statement of an absolute, and everything in life is contextual requiring a check-thought not rigid belief or acceptance, especially when, as now, we have an Alice in Wonderland demockracy.

  15. bwaghorn 15

    Greywarshark show me a better way then .

    • greywarshark 15.1

      Calling on Churchill are you bw. We all need to think about it, not just me. We have wrecked our world which we hoped post WW2 we would improve. Now we are against the wall wailing at climate change and bad water and deteriorating conditions and high prices waiting for someone to help us from having to face our realities.

      And so many have a sad story to tell I find. But few have any reasonable ideas on how to remedy the situation. And then the nihilist govt will undo small useful policies that took years to set up, They talk effectiveness, efficiency and productivity but they care naught. Our politicians motto in NZ is; 'Hot air – Don't care'.

Leave a Comment