Daily Review 28/05/2015

10 comments on “Daily Review 28/05/2015”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

    1. 1.1

      Aye … good line!

      Working on a post because I can’t reconcile McCully’s comments to Parliament with TVNZ’s statement.

    1. 3.2

      I think that, in relation to Fairfax, they mean “‘journalism'” rather than “journalism”.

    2. 3.4

      automating PR focused press releases onto news articles via a copy/paste could be done by software so why the need for expensive people.

    3. 3.5

      At least the headline says ‘affect’ rather than ‘impact’, the latter usage having become the norm in many quarters.
      I don’t expect most people to know or care about the difference, but it’s one reason I’m not jeering with the rest here to see more subs out of work.

Comments are closed.