Written By:
- Date published:
5:30 pm, July 15th, 2026 - 15 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
Daily review is also your post.
This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Don’t forget to be kind to each other …
Say it ain't so Dave.
/
https://bsky.app/profile/chriswerry.bsky.social/post/3mqnnmvit222z
[…]
https://employborderless.com/hiring-intelligence/employer-burden-index/
Everything feels like a burden if you don’t want to do it.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/country/677632/almost-40-percent-of-dairy-farmers-not-meeting-fertiliser-reporting-rules
Kids who cry that something is too hard are not likely to become Olympic Gold medallists, so whiners believe they can pick winners??
What mycoplasma bovis?
https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/360963680/kaikoura-dairy-farmer-fined-35000-failing-track-cattle-movements
https://www.mpi.govt.nz/news/media-releases/livestock-trader-fined-10000-for-not-declaring-movement-of-513-nait-cattle
I notice that the detail in the link gives the annual leave for New Zealand as being zero. He also don't seem to have included KiwiSaver.
Still a surprising result though.
Unless you own a dairy farm or have a real estate license in Queenstown, employment public sector or private sector right now is a complete bloodbath.
How come the private sector?
It mentions no National Insurance/payroll tax like costs on the employer.
KiwiSaver is not compulsory and John Key allowed total remuneration clauses
https://www.stuff.co.nz/money/360931811/policy-costing-kiwi-workers-thousands-dollars-every-year-even-retirement-commission-wants-it-banned
Annual Leave?
What is says is
https://employborderless.com/eor/countries/new-zealand/
It says that but in the table it leaves the column for annual leave blank.
It should have reflected the required 20 days.
Chris Werry replied to Mark Daalder
Or an assessment of holiday pay or sickness entitlement.
I wasn't paying close-enough attention to the news last night – that ACT Party figure who's admitted to further sexual offending and pleaded guilty to one charge of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection.
Is that Paul Henry?
No it's jago the guy seymour covered up for at the election
Jago – an influential figure in the ACT party?
Is he why Brooke van Velden fled?
Or was it Michael Laws??
please stop speculating on things that are potentially defamatory and put the site owners at risk of legal action. Making it a question doesn't change that.
You are free to link and talk about what is in the public domain.
by public domain, I mean reliable sources, not reckons on FB or wherever. If MSM aren't reporting it, it's because their lawyers have said not to.
In this case, there is reporting on Jago, but please stick to reported facts and known information.
Thanks for the clarification, weka. Jago it is.