Gilmore Sutton Key

Written By: notices and features - Date published: - 8 comments
Categories: john key, Minister for International Embarrassment, workers' rights - Tags: , , , ,

gilmore-sutton-key

8 comments on “Gilmore Sutton Key”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

  1. 1

    yeah, like, at the end of..most reasonable new zillinders…pfffft.

    His pall keyreeping over the land of hiijinks and horseplay and goodtimes.
    Will no-one ride us of this flagrant beast?

  2. 2

    Some women just can’t take a joke, don’t know how to have fun. Some women just need to chill the hell out. All this PC crap.

    1. 2.1

      FFS Tracey, how would you like it if someone was to come into your work place & pull your hair everytime they entered your place of work???
      I doubt very much that you would let it slide.

  4. 4

    Too ‘big’ to fail?

    (And not even a ‘fast follower’ when it comes to higher standards it seems.)

    I suspect the difference between Key and the other two is all about the state of the power dynamics in each case.

    Gilmore was a political shrimp that could be usefully tossed onto the barbie.

    Sutton had enemies in high places which made him increasingly vulnerable (by his own admission, he had been acting in the same ways for most of his career – another lover of ‘hijinks’, ‘horsing around’, etc. – yet that behaviour only proved fatal last year.)

    John Key, by contrast, currently still has too many people gaining from and identifying with his electoral popularity to be able to leverage his limpet-like grip off the top spot.

    Those with sufficient power (in Key’s case, popularity) can harass more or less at will, it seems.

    As I said, too big to fail.

    1. 4.1

      +1

      That’s about it. One set of rules for the rich and powerful and another set for everyone else.

  5. 5

    One of these three is not like the others sung a la Sesame Street circa 1990 (yes, I was parenting way back then and saw way too much children’s programming).

    Short, concise and precise. Any fool should be able to get that message, lol.

Comments are closed.