Daily review 12/03/2019

Written By: notices and features - Date published: - 52 comments
Categories: Daily review

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

52 comments on “Daily review 12/03/2019”

Comment numbers have changed to permanent references. Older quoted numbers may no longer identify the same comment.

    1. 2.1

      Funny, when I read it I thought the same.

      I think he does dodge it because he’s bankrupt Bwaghorn, but am not 100% sure.

      Either way, am happy for Matthew Blomfield. Mind you he probably deserves to be paid $1million rather than $70k for all the shite that whale blubber put him through.

      1. 2.1.1

        The case took years to be heard and now there is finally a ruling, Blomfield has been denied what should rightfully be his because the revolting blowhard has declared himself a bankrupt. He has a house which as far as I know he owns – probably in a trust. Force the sale regardless and leave him with nothing but the rags on his back.

        There’s something rotten about a Justice system that allows this to happen.

                    4. 2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4

                      Oh but I assure you they do,… they have a cozy open plan single bedroom, exterior plumbing ( bucket ) only some mold , and if ones careful , leaks from the roof can be avoided by shifting ones bed.

                      Spare thatching is supplied at a slight added cost, however…

                      The earthen floor is perfect with those ‘back to nature’ types, and fresh water is nary a block away in the form of a well ( again a bucket is supplied – the rope you will have to procure ) .

                      But apart from that – perfect for the young professional couple.

                      A mansion befitting a Lord and his Lady.

    3. 2.3

      I read that the “breakdown in health” card wasn’t played until Slater was required to attend the court session which would have been the final denouement of his tattered fantasies. To me it looks like that when finally forced to confront reality, Slater simply shut down and declared he had had a “stroke” – interestingly, one of his nefarious close fellow travellers in his smears for cash business model had also tried to avoid bankruptcy by declaring a personal health crisis.

      Insofar as his requirement to pay damages the ownership of the holding company for his primary asset (his mangy attack blog) seems to have been shuffled around several times and it seems it is now primarily owned by his utterly crackers wife. It won’t save him, but he’ll probably try and avoid the inevitable and drag it out through the courts whilst whining for donations and hoping someone will bail him out.

      All in all, an interesting public study in the mental landscape of a delusional and vicious bully.

      1. 2.3.1

        Yes but an important tool of DP V1.0 for the right. Aside from Blomfield consider all the other paid hit jobs he performed to people without the means to do something about it.

        I have zero empathy for the oily orca. Karma baby.

      2. 2.3.2

        It must burn his guts that his former pay masters all got away Scot free . It’s a shame he doesn’t spill his secrets

    2. 4.2

      “I don’t think National MPs have anything to worry about” says Simon.

      Party officials on the other hand ..

      1. 4.2.1

        Under the bus they go!

        It can’t be a happy party with Simon in charge, can it?

        Thing is from the texts, the party officials were the ones who were trying to keep Simon on the straight and narrow. But not Simon. He will not be kept on the straight and narrow.

        Simon’s phone call with Jami-Lee Ross raises issues of either outright corruption from the leader of the National Party, or complete incompetence.

        Hard to know which is worse for the Opposition…

  7. 7

    Meanwhile , as Soimons having difficulty’s here , the Russians seem to be having problems of their own…

    2 Russian Bigfoots Ripping Trees Out of Frozen Earth – YouTube

    1. 7.1

      Do you not think, the slowing down and enlargement plus repeating the same shot over and over again to insert the thought, is all a bit sorta useless?

          1. 7.1.1.1.1

            Next time your out there tell me when you find a deer carcass that died of natural circumstances … or even a captain cooker…

            OR,… you could try some of these…

            [Emc=Q] #015 – J.C. JOHNSON: Bigfoot DNA Confirmed [Crypto-Hunter]
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcRekRxamdU

            Yowiehunters.com_Yowie_Sightings – YouTube
            https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJc4xuqi8BHCOm_PxIhP66Q

            JC Johnson – YouTube
            https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZv-VflCB-aCEvzHoarhjZg

            50 YEARS WITH BIGFOOT – Photographs – WELCOME TO BIGFOOT …
            https://www.bigfootcasefiles.com/50-years-with-bigfoot—photographs.html

            The extinction of the Australian pygmies – Quadrant Online
            https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/history…/06/the-extinction-of-the-australian-pygmies/

                1. 7.1.1.1.1.1.1.1

                  And to find out what they may sound like, there’s this…

                  Sasquatch Vocalizations: Clips from the Berry/Morehead … – YouTube

                  Or something that will really make you never want to camp again , perhaps this,

                  Sasquatch Sierra Sounds by Ron Morehead & Al Berry in … – YouTube

                  And if you think New Zealand escaped any high strangeness, the Maoris talked about Moehau man , in fact , like Australia and china, and the USA, – we had several recognized apparently.. Toanginas ,Matau giants, Maero , Taniwahs , Tuuhourangi and Toangina , – possibly simplified down into 1 or 2 species..

                  The above taken from;

                  The Australian Yowie Research Centre Established By Rex Gilroy in …
                  http://www.australianyowieresearchcentre.com/

                  Oh , and Americas top Naval linguistics officer whose tasks included deciphering cryptic codes used by other nations heard the above Ron Morehead recordings and deduced that it was indeed, an actual language…

    1. 8.1

      Just a regular Kiwiblog commenter. We have literally tens of thousands of Tucker Carlsons in this country and are importing more all the time from Britain and South Africa.

      Yet we are not allowed to call them out…

      1. 8.1.1

        a few here like the “Credited “white men” for “creating civilization”” one – seems popular with certain types.

      2. 8.1.2

        Ironically you are a regular kiwiblog commenter who calls others racist names on there.

        The hypocrisy in muttonbird is strong.

        1. 8.1.2.1

          Oh yes. What racist names do I call Kiwiblog commenters? I wasn’t aware there were any minorities on that forum.

          And since you are here, are you able to reconcile your support for Michael Hosking deliberately playing Michael Jackson songs on his show despite the compounding evidence that he groomed children and their families?

          It’s like Mike Hosking and yourself giving a high five to Cardinal Pell and saying good job with those choir boys.

          James, are you still supportive of Michael Jackson?

          1. 8.1.2.1.1

            I’m not sure why you have it in for Michael Jackson’s music. He was only 14 when he sang Ben, a song that is apparently politically incorrect to listen to.

            As for the “compounding evidence that he groomed children and their families”, that’s an unproven allegation. What is a fact is that two men – Wade Robson and James Safechuck – testified under oath (as adults) that Jackson didn’t abuse them. Perjury is a crime in NZ (and elsewhere) with a maximum sentence of 7 years.

            https://www.mjfacts.com/wade-robson-testimony/

            1. 8.1.2.1.1.1

              If you watch the documentary you will realise just what a manipulative sick fuck Jackson was. No court would find those men guilty of perjury under the circumstances.

              1. 8.1.2.1.1.1.1

                A jury might well conclude that as they had testified under oath they were telling the truth when they said Jackson didn’t abuse them. So yes, not guilty of perjury.

Comments are closed.