Written By:
- Date published:
5:30 pm, December 2nd, 2025 - 1 comment
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
Daily review is also your post.
This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Don’t forget to be kind to each other …
Softening us up
ANALYSIS ONE
She is making the statement (rather than Luxon) to infer its domestic policy about saving money here … not being bad people, in not keeping out international obligations (Luxon and Peters and Watts area).
Effectively the coalition out of the Paris Accord compliance but has not had the honesty to say so. National is following ACT policy.
https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs
Someone should ask MFAT (Official Information and or in the House to Peters, Watts and Luxon, about what impact his will have on
1.our international standing
2.trade with the EU
3.our (now doomed?) effort to lead a path to rebuilding WTO (sans MFN breech nation USA) – we will become bystanders to the work of others. If they require Paris Accord compliance what then?
ANALYSIS TWO
Willis is not including the cost of buying the credits in future budgets to make them look better than they are.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/580628/govt-needs-to-buy-carbon-credits-or-come-clean-on-emissions-commitment-opposition