Written By:
- Date published:
12:56 pm, February 27th, 2026 - 7 comments
Categories: Christopher Luxon, crime, law and "order", mark mitchell, paul goldsmith, police -
Tags: domestic violence, gangs, Meth crisis, Police recruits, Violent crime survey
Excerpt from Mountain Tui Substack
In 2024, under questioning about why police were culling the gang membership list on National’s watch, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon snapped.
“It’s not about the friggin’ targets” he lashed out angrily.
Not his first time and it wouldn’t be his last.
In July 2025, when Labour leader Chris Hipkins pointed out that National’s signature Family Boost policy had been a “flop”, with 25% of money spent on administration, and fewer than 50 families getting the promised package, Luxon snapped at “frickin’” Chris Hipkins too.
Yesterday, Luxon set out to enjoy his moment in the sun, to shine and boast about falling violent crime incidents in quarterly results of what used to be an annual survey.

Under National, Paul Goldsmith, Mark Mitchell and Luxon have been keen to use it regularly to “drum in” a message that law and order has purportedly improved under their government.
But has it really?



The drug crisis also continues unabated, with a 200%-400% increase in meth use on National’s watch in what is being called a methamphetamine crisis across the country.
Cocaine is also up, gang profits have doubled, and extremely worrying is organised crime syndicates are growing – many with international links including from China and Southeast Asia, Latin American cartels, and Australian gangs.
The real and most pervasive issue we face under National, ACT and NZ First is that all three parties persist in prioritising headlines and PR over tackling the deeper root causes and drivers of crime in our country.
That type of rot will not be easy to undo.
That type of rot will not be easy to undo.
It follows Judith Collins fudging Police stats during her stint as Minister of Police under Key.
Now we have PR and funding cuts to Border and Customs staffing.
They say one thing and do another. Abysmal. Move on 7th of Nov. CoC.
So, what is your solution to the actual problem? I don't really care about politicians, they are all the same. Labour wont be able to hold this "tide" – it makes me lough, those crims are not party bound.
I like to hear about a feasible solution to stem the drug tide, the gangs and crime.
You seem to be assuming that this is all just one (admittedly big) problem with one solution (aka one size fits all). If so, I assume that you’ll reject any genuine reply here, like you reject all politicians outright (and singling out Labour).
Here’s something to challenge your thinking:
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/top/560896/drug-trends-survey-paints-clearer-picture-of-gangs-place-in-the-market
You have a lot of information but I am genuinely interested in a solution. I have seen none thus far from any corner.
Except the brachial approach in El Salvador President Nayib Bukele. Do we want that, do we end up going there?
A solution for what exactly? The point of my reply was to make you think and hopefully realise that what you were referring to (i.e., “drug tide, the gangs and crime”) are a set of complex interconnected issues that have no single ‘solution’ as such. The details & numbers are not so important, the bigger picture is.
Following on from the above, you won’t see any, I think, but if anybody offers you a ‘solution’, I’d view it with the same caution as snake oil (aka overly simplistic and populist). A good approach would be a holistic systemic proactive and long-term one addressing some of the deep underlying factors rather than symptom-focussed reactive & reactionary short-term reductionist ‘solutions’.
I don’t know what you mean and I assume your question was rhetorical.
Gangs peddling narcotics must be one of NZ's few growth industries.
And you would be wrong; see my comment @ 1.1.1 (https://thestandard.nz/gangs-outnumber-police-in-new-zealand-but-thats-not-all/#comment-2056665).